Physical activity interventions for executive function in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Executive function (EF), including working memory, inhibitory control, and cognitive flexibility, is essential for adolescent learning, self-regulation, and adaptive behavior. Physical activity (PA) has been proposed as a promising strategy to improve EF during adolescence. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the effects of exercise interventions on EF in adolescents. PubMed and Web of Science (WOS) were systematically searched for English-language randomized controlled trials published up to July 2024. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, and standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. A total of 12 studies were included. Exercise interventions significantly improved working memory (SMD = 0.37, 95% CI [0.03, 0.71], p = 0.03). Inhibitory control showed a borderline significant improvement (SMD = −0.27, 95% CI [−0.55, 0.00], p = 0.05), while no significant overall effect was observed for cognitive flexibility (SMD = 0.50, 95% CI [−0.21, 1.21], p = 0.17). Subgroup analyses suggested that single sessions of 30–40 min were associated with larger estimated effects on working memory (SMD = 1.47, 95% CI [1.11, 1.83], p < 0.00001) and cognitive flexibility (SMD = 1.59, 95% CI [0.12, 3.06], p = 0.03), though these findings warrant cautious interpretation given limited study numbersand substantial heterogeneity. Interventions exceeding 10 weeks yielded a significant effect on working memory (SMD = 0.30, 95% CI [0.12, 0.47], p = 0.0009), whereas 8–10 weeks programs showedthe largest subgroup effects for inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility . Overall, exercise interventions may benefit selected domains of EF in adolescents, with the strongest evidence for working memory. However, the findings for inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility should be interpreted cautiously because of borderline significance, nonsignificant overall effects, and substantial heterogeneity across studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology Health & Medicine
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2026.2688452
Primary Topic
Children's Physical and Motor Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physical activity interventions for executive function in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Shiqing Zhang, LIU Min, Lijin Zhao, Jianhang Sun
Psychology Health & Medicine
Children's Physical and Motor Development
article

Physical activity interventions for executive function in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Shiqing Zhang, LIU Min, Lijin Zhao, Jianhang Sun
article en

Abstract

Executive function (EF), including working memory, inhibitory control, and cognitive flexibility, is essential for adolescent learning, self-regulation, and adaptive behavior. Physical activity (PA) has been proposed as a promising strategy to improve EF during adolescence. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the effects of exercise interventions on EF in adolescents. PubMed and Web of Science (WOS) were systematically searched for English-language randomized controlled trials published up to July 2024. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, and standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. A total of 12 studies were included. Exercise interventions significantly improved working memory (SMD = 0.37, 95% CI [0.03, 0.71], p = 0.03). Inhibitory control showed a borderline significant improvement (SMD = −0.27, 95% CI [−0.55, 0.00], p = 0.05), while no significant overall effect was observed for cognitive flexibility (SMD = 0.50, 95% CI [−0.21, 1.21], p = 0.17). Subgroup analyses suggested that single sessions of 30–40 min were associated with larger estimated effects on working memory (SMD = 1.47, 95% CI [1.11, 1.83], p < 0.00001) and cognitive flexibility (SMD = 1.59, 95% CI [0.12, 3.06], p = 0.03), though these findings warrant cautious interpretation given limited study numbersand substantial heterogeneity. Interventions exceeding 10 weeks yielded a significant effect on working memory (SMD = 0.30, 95% CI [0.12, 0.47], p = 0.0009), whereas 8–10 weeks programs showedthe largest subgroup effects for inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility . Overall, exercise interventions may benefit selected domains of EF in adolescents, with the strongest evidence for working memory. However, the findings for inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility should be interpreted cautiously because of borderline significance, nonsignificant overall effects, and substantial heterogeneity across studies.

Psychology Health & Medicine
Shanxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Children's Physical and Motor Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.