Factors influencing the implementation and sustainability of 5S at a private general hospital in Vietnam

To analyze the factors affecting the results of 5S (Sort, Set in Order, Shine, Standardize, and Sustain) implementation at a private general hospital in Vietnam in 2024. This study used a convergent parallel mixed-method design. The quantitative method was based on 84 observations using a checklist across four high-risk zones: injection carts, medicine cabinets, offices, and patient rooms in all seven clinical departments of the hospital. The qualitative method included 11 in-depth interviews and 2 focus group discussions with representatives from hospital leadership, departments, and staff. The qualitative content was analyzed by thematic grouping. The average score for 5S implementation in clinical departments was 3.48/5. The average scores for each step were: S1 (Sort) 3.78/5, S2 (Set in order) 3.54/5, S3 (Shine) 3.92/5, S4 (Standardize) 3.20/5, and the lowest was S5 (Sustain) 2.96/5. The lower scores of S4 and S5 can be explained by inadequate standard guidelines for the specific position, and not all staff fully understood these steps. Several factors influence the successful implementation of 5S, including leadership commitment, active staff participation, regular training, supervision, and appropriate reward mechanisms. The study suggests that standardization from S1 to S3 for the specific areas, regular training, and supervision are important to improve the Sustainability of 5S.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Public Health
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12982-026-02452-6
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors influencing the implementation and sustainability of 5S at a private general hospital in Vietnam

Pham Quynh Anh, Ngoc Tuan Vo, Phong Hoai Nguyen, Si Dung Chu et al.
Discover Public Health
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Factors influencing the implementation and sustainability of 5S at a private general hospital in Vietnam

Pham Quynh Anh, Ngoc Tuan Vo, Phong Hoai Nguyen, Si Dung Chu, Nga Thi Thuy Nguyen
article en

Abstract

To analyze the factors affecting the results of 5S (Sort, Set in Order, Shine, Standardize, and Sustain) implementation at a private general hospital in Vietnam in 2024. This study used a convergent parallel mixed-method design. The quantitative method was based on 84 observations using a checklist across four high-risk zones: injection carts, medicine cabinets, offices, and patient rooms in all seven clinical departments of the hospital. The qualitative method included 11 in-depth interviews and 2 focus group discussions with representatives from hospital leadership, departments, and staff. The qualitative content was analyzed by thematic grouping. The average score for 5S implementation in clinical departments was 3.48/5. The average scores for each step were: S1 (Sort) 3.78/5, S2 (Set in order) 3.54/5, S3 (Shine) 3.92/5, S4 (Standardize) 3.20/5, and the lowest was S5 (Sustain) 2.96/5. The lower scores of S4 and S5 can be explained by inadequate standard guidelines for the specific position, and not all staff fully understood these steps. Several factors influence the successful implementation of 5S, including leadership commitment, active staff participation, regular training, supervision, and appropriate reward mechanisms. The study suggests that standardization from S1 to S3 for the specific areas, regular training, and supervision are important to improve the Sustainability of 5S.

Discover Public HealthVol. 23(1)
Thai Nguyen National General Hospital (VN), Hanoi School Of Public Health (VN), Hanoi University (VN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.