Impact of Exposure Parameters on Deep Learning Models in Chest Radiography and Implications for Deployment

Purpose To investigate whether deep learning models trained on chest radiographs (CXRs) rely on radiographic exposure parameters as shortcut features and to quantify the resulting biases under controlled confounding and natural exposure regimes. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, CXRs from MIMIC-CXR (January 2011–December 2016), the Medical Imaging and Data Resource Center (MIDRC; August 2020–May 2022), and EmoryCXR (September 2008–February 2023) were analyzed for pneumothorax detection, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnosis, and race classification. Dataset-provided labels served as the reference standard. Three exposure parameters (ExposureTime, XRayTubeCurrent, ExposureInuAs) were extracted from Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) metadata. Models were trained under biased and balanced exposure–label alignments and evaluated on matched and reversed distributions. A priori screening additionally identified high-risk exposure regimes. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was compared using the DeLong test. Results A total of 727,604 CXRs from 240,681 patients (mean age, 60 years ± 17 [SD]; 126,432 men, 114,128 women) were analyzed. For pneumothorax detection, AUC decreased from 0.94 (95% CI: 0.94, 0.95) to 0.56 (95% CI: 0.55, 0.58) on mismatched exposure distributions (ΔAUC = –0.38; P < .001). Similar declines were observed for COVID-19 (ΔAUC = –0.33; P < .001) and race classification (ΔAUC = –0.09; P < .001). The priori exposure-regimen screening revealed high-risk regimes within the natural distribution that were associated with reduced model performance compared with typical exposures. Conclusion Deep learning models trained on CXRs may exploit exposure parameters as shortcut features; exposure-regimen audits may flag high-risk conditions before clinical deployment. ©RSNA, 2026

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiology Artificial Intelligence
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.250731
Primary Topic
COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Exposure Parameters on Deep Learning Models in Chest Radiography and Implications for Deployment

Judy Wawira Gichoya, Rodrigo Rosa Gameiro, H. Shu, Po‐Chih Kuo et al.
Radiology Artificial Intelligence
COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
article

Impact of Exposure Parameters on Deep Learning Models in Chest Radiography and Implications for Deployment

Judy Wawira Gichoya, Rodrigo Rosa Gameiro, H. Shu, Po‐Chih Kuo, Shiang-Yu Chang, Leo Anthony Celi
article en

Abstract

Purpose To investigate whether deep learning models trained on chest radiographs (CXRs) rely on radiographic exposure parameters as shortcut features and to quantify the resulting biases under controlled confounding and natural exposure regimes. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, CXRs from MIMIC-CXR (January 2011–December 2016), the Medical Imaging and Data Resource Center (MIDRC; August 2020–May 2022), and EmoryCXR (September 2008–February 2023) were analyzed for pneumothorax detection, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnosis, and race classification. Dataset-provided labels served as the reference standard. Three exposure parameters (ExposureTime, XRayTubeCurrent, ExposureInuAs) were extracted from Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) metadata. Models were trained under biased and balanced exposure–label alignments and evaluated on matched and reversed distributions. A priori screening additionally identified high-risk exposure regimes. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was compared using the DeLong test. Results A total of 727,604 CXRs from 240,681 patients (mean age, 60 years ± 17 [SD]; 126,432 men, 114,128 women) were analyzed. For pneumothorax detection, AUC decreased from 0.94 (95% CI: 0.94, 0.95) to 0.56 (95% CI: 0.55, 0.58) on mismatched exposure distributions (ΔAUC = –0.38; P < .001). Similar declines were observed for COVID-19 (ΔAUC = –0.33; P < .001) and race classification (ΔAUC = –0.09; P < .001). The priori exposure-regimen screening revealed high-risk regimes within the natural distribution that were associated with reduced model performance compared with typical exposures. Conclusion Deep learning models trained on CXRs may exploit exposure parameters as shortcut features; exposure-regimen audits may flag high-risk conditions before clinical deployment. ©RSNA, 2026

Radiology Artificial Intelligence
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US), Emory University (US), National Tsing Hua University (TW), Cancer Research And Biostatistics (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.