Years in Practice, Differences in Perspectives: Survey Findings From Age‐Friendly Pharmacists

BACKGROUND: Early adoption of innovation is important for the implementation of evidence-based practices. Care of older adults using Age-Friendly practices optimizes the What Matters, Medication, Mobility, and Mentation (4Ms) framework. Within the first year of availability, over 1900 individuals acquired Age-Friendly pharmacist recognition. The purpose of this study is to characterize the demographics, preparedness, motivation, and professional association affiliation of pharmacists who received Age-Friendly recognition. METHODS: A quantitative survey was administered to all participants as the last of four steps in Age-Friendly pharmacist recognition. The target population was Age-Friendly pharmacists who self-administer the online questionnaire. New practitioners (within 6 years of graduation) and pharmacists with 6+ (6+) years of practice were compared using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Between March 2025 and February 2026, 1953 individuals received Age-Friendly Pharmacist recognition, 285 (15.4% of cohort) of whom were new practitioners with a mean age of 29.7 ± 4.4 years and 74.4% female. The 6+ group comprised 1567 (84.6% of cohort) pharmacists, mean age 45.3 ± 9.1 years, and 74.6% female. One quarter of new practitioners and 57.4% of the 6+ group were board-certified. Of those who were board-certified, 34% of new practitioners were board-certified in geriatrics and pharmacotherapy, whereas geriatrics certification was prevalent (82.2%) in the 6+ group. Improving the quality of care was the primary motivation to seek Age-Friendly recognition for both groups, followed by free continuing education, a digital badge, and advancing their skill set. New practitioners learned about Age-Friendly recognition from employers (46.7%), peers (39.1%), and social media (18.6%), whereas the 6+ group learned about Age-Friendly on the ASCP website (43.3%). For both groups, employers played an important role in disseminating information about and in supporting pharmacists to achieve Age-Friendly recognition. CONCLUSION: Highly qualified pharmacists were motivated to seek Age-Friendly recognition by a desire to improve the quality of care for older adults, free continuing education, a digital badge, and to advance their skill set.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JACCP JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.70244
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Years in Practice, Differences in Perspectives: Survey Findings From Age‐Friendly Pharmacists

Nicole Brandt, Dagmara Zajac, Avra Thomas, Emily Francis et al.
JACCP JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
article

Years in Practice, Differences in Perspectives: Survey Findings From Age‐Friendly Pharmacists

Nicole Brandt, Dagmara Zajac, Avra Thomas, Emily Francis, Barbara J. Zarowitz, Michael Brodeur, Donna Bartlett
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early adoption of innovation is important for the implementation of evidence-based practices. Care of older adults using Age-Friendly practices optimizes the What Matters, Medication, Mobility, and Mentation (4Ms) framework. Within the first year of availability, over 1900 individuals acquired Age-Friendly pharmacist recognition. The purpose of this study is to characterize the demographics, preparedness, motivation, and professional association affiliation of pharmacists who received Age-Friendly recognition. METHODS: A quantitative survey was administered to all participants as the last of four steps in Age-Friendly pharmacist recognition. The target population was Age-Friendly pharmacists who self-administer the online questionnaire. New practitioners (within 6 years of graduation) and pharmacists with 6+ (6+) years of practice were compared using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Between March 2025 and February 2026, 1953 individuals received Age-Friendly Pharmacist recognition, 285 (15.4% of cohort) of whom were new practitioners with a mean age of 29.7 ± 4.4 years and 74.4% female. The 6+ group comprised 1567 (84.6% of cohort) pharmacists, mean age 45.3 ± 9.1 years, and 74.6% female. One quarter of new practitioners and 57.4% of the 6+ group were board-certified. Of those who were board-certified, 34% of new practitioners were board-certified in geriatrics and pharmacotherapy, whereas geriatrics certification was prevalent (82.2%) in the 6+ group. Improving the quality of care was the primary motivation to seek Age-Friendly recognition for both groups, followed by free continuing education, a digital badge, and advancing their skill set. New practitioners learned about Age-Friendly recognition from employers (46.7%), peers (39.1%), and social media (18.6%), whereas the 6+ group learned about Age-Friendly on the ASCP website (43.3%). For both groups, employers played an important role in disseminating information about and in supporting pharmacists to achieve Age-Friendly recognition. CONCLUSION: Highly qualified pharmacists were motivated to seek Age-Friendly recognition by a desire to improve the quality of care for older adults, free continuing education, a digital badge, and to advance their skill set.

JACCP JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACYVol. 9(7)
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), Cleveland Clinic (US), Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences (US), American Society of Consultant Pharmacists (US), Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences (US)
John A. Hartford Foundation
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.