Volumetric analysis of cervical intervertebral discs: Reference values for interventional cervical disc procedures

Background MRI does not reliably identify symptomatic cervical discs, and normative cervical disc volumetrics remain poorly defined. Objective To establish level-specific cervical disc volume norms after excluding non-intradiscal contrast flow and to compare volumes between pain-positive and pain-negative discs. Methods This retrospective 10-year study analyzed cervical discograms with contained intradiscal filling; discs with epidural, vascular, or prevertebral extravasation were excluded. Injected volumes were recorded, and interlevel and pain-group comparisons were performed using ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis, t-tests, and Mann–Whitney U testing. Results A total of 135 discs met the inclusion criteria. The overall mean injected cervical disc volume was 0.24 ± 0.10 mL (range, 0.10 – 0.60 mL), with no significant differences across cervical levels. Pain-positive discs demonstrated higher injected volumes at C3/4, C4/5, C5/6, and C6/7 compared with pain-negative discs (p < 0.05). Conclusion Cervical disc volumetrics are consistent across levels, with higher volumes noted in pain-positive discs at mid-cervical levels. These baseline values should be referenced for intradiscal injections to guide administered volumes and to help prevent disc overpressurization.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Interventional Pain Medicine
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpm.2026.100798
Primary Topic
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Volumetric analysis of cervical intervertebral discs: Reference values for interventional cervical disc procedures

Fred DeFrancesch, Waleed Sultan, William Lee, Jay Napolitano
Interventional Pain Medicine
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
article

Volumetric analysis of cervical intervertebral discs: Reference values for interventional cervical disc procedures

Fred DeFrancesch, Waleed Sultan, William Lee, Jay Napolitano
article en

Abstract

Background MRI does not reliably identify symptomatic cervical discs, and normative cervical disc volumetrics remain poorly defined. Objective To establish level-specific cervical disc volume norms after excluding non-intradiscal contrast flow and to compare volumes between pain-positive and pain-negative discs. Methods This retrospective 10-year study analyzed cervical discograms with contained intradiscal filling; discs with epidural, vascular, or prevertebral extravasation were excluded. Injected volumes were recorded, and interlevel and pain-group comparisons were performed using ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis, t-tests, and Mann–Whitney U testing. Results A total of 135 discs met the inclusion criteria. The overall mean injected cervical disc volume was 0.24 ± 0.10 mL (range, 0.10 – 0.60 mL), with no significant differences across cervical levels. Pain-positive discs demonstrated higher injected volumes at C3/4, C4/5, C5/6, and C6/7 compared with pain-negative discs (p < 0.05). Conclusion Cervical disc volumetrics are consistent across levels, with higher volumes noted in pain-positive discs at mid-cervical levels. These baseline values should be referenced for intradiscal injections to guide administered volumes and to help prevent disc overpressurization.

Interventional Pain MedicineVol. 5(3)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.