Who Uses Reputation Information for Their Decision to Trust?

Trust decisions often rely on a partner’s reputation, yet little is known about interindividual differences in how people use such information when deciding whom to trust. Across four pre-registered studies (total N = 1,171), we examined whether associations between trust-related personality traits and trust vary as a function of a trustee’s reputation. We focused on three traits that should differentially interact with reputation information: General Trust—the tendency to believe in the benevolence of others; Victim Sensitivity—the anxious expectation of being exploited by others; and Honesty-Humility—an individual’s dispositional prosociality. In Studies 1–3, participants acted as trustors in peer-to-peer car-sharing scenarios and rated either the trustworthiness of potential renters or their intention to rent out their car. In Study 4, participants made real, incentivized trust decisions in economic trust games with reputation cues based on actual behavior. Across studies, higher reputation consistently increased trust, and General Trust showed a broad positive association with trust. By contrast, Victim Sensitivity and Honesty-Humility showed reputation-contingent associations with trust; however, the specific interaction patterns varied across studies. Overall, trustor personality and trustee reputation jointly shape trust, yet the nature of this interplay differs across personality traits and the motivational tendencies they capture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Personality
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070261460146
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who Uses Reputation Information for Their Decision to Trust?

Mario Gollwitzer, Lucas John Emmanuel Köhler, Mathias Twardawski, Stephan Nuding
European Journal of Personality
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
article

Who Uses Reputation Information for Their Decision to Trust?

Mario Gollwitzer, Lucas John Emmanuel Köhler, Mathias Twardawski, Stephan Nuding
article en

Abstract

Trust decisions often rely on a partner’s reputation, yet little is known about interindividual differences in how people use such information when deciding whom to trust. Across four pre-registered studies (total N = 1,171), we examined whether associations between trust-related personality traits and trust vary as a function of a trustee’s reputation. We focused on three traits that should differentially interact with reputation information: General Trust—the tendency to believe in the benevolence of others; Victim Sensitivity—the anxious expectation of being exploited by others; and Honesty-Humility—an individual’s dispositional prosociality. In Studies 1–3, participants acted as trustors in peer-to-peer car-sharing scenarios and rated either the trustworthiness of potential renters or their intention to rent out their car. In Study 4, participants made real, incentivized trust decisions in economic trust games with reputation cues based on actual behavior. Across studies, higher reputation consistently increased trust, and General Trust showed a broad positive association with trust. By contrast, Victim Sensitivity and Honesty-Humility showed reputation-contingent associations with trust; however, the specific interaction patterns varied across studies. Overall, trustor personality and trustee reputation jointly shape trust, yet the nature of this interplay differs across personality traits and the motivational tendencies they capture.

European Journal of Personality
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.