Increased Knee Range of Motion Following Rectus Femoris Transfer Does Not Improve Walking Ability in Patients With Cerebral Palsy

BACKGROUND: Rectus femoris transfer (RFT) outcomes in cerebral palsy (CP) are often analyzed using 3-dimensional gait analysis, but there is limited patient-reported data on this procedure. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between changes in walking ability, measured by the Functional Assessment Questionnaire (FAQ), and knee range of motion (KRM) improvements following distal RFT in CP. METHODS: Data from a gait laboratory database (January 2002 to April 2022) were reviewed. Patients with spastic diplegic CP classified as GMFCS levels I to III who underwent RFT with pre- and postoperative gait analyses were included. Ninety-eight patients met the criteria and were divided into 3 groups based on KRM changes post-RFT: (1) reduction (RG): decrease >1 SD, (2) unchanged (UG): changes within ±1 SD, and (3) improvement (IG): increase >1 SD. Demographics, kinematics, the Gait Deviation Index (GDI), and FAQ scores were analyzed and compared among groups. RESULTS: Postsurgery, KRM decreased in 6 patients (6.1%), remained unchanged in 69 (70.4%), and improved in 23 (23.5%). RG was excluded from comparisons due to the small sample size. There were no significant between-group differences in age at surgery (UG: 14.32 y; IG: 14.32 y), follow-up duration (UG: 3.17 y; IG: 2.70 y), change in GDI (UG: +8.14; IG: +11.07), increase in peak knee flexion during the swing phase (UG: +6.44 degrees; IG: +7.34 degrees), or change in walking ability as measured by the FAQ (UG: +0.79; IG: -0.08). In contrast, minimum knee flexion during the stance phase decreased in IG (-14.32 degrees) and increased in UG (+4.78 degrees), with a significant between-group difference (P<0.001). The prevalence of surgical procedures performed concomitantly with RFT was similar between the UG and IG groups, except for surgical lengthening of the hip adductors, which was observed in 13% of patients in UG and 34.8% in IG (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in kinematic parameters alone may not predict patient-reported functional gains. In the present study, increased KRM after RFT was not associated with improved FAQ walking ability, as FAQ scores were similar regardless of whether KRM increased. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/bpo.0000000000003392
Primary Topic
Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Increased Knee Range of Motion Following Rectus Femoris Transfer Does Not Improve Walking Ability in Patients With Cerebral Palsy

Mauro César de Morais Filho, Cátia M. Kawamura, José A.F. Lopes, Ageu de O. Saraiva et al.
Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics
Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
article

Increased Knee Range of Motion Following Rectus Femoris Transfer Does Not Improve Walking Ability in Patients With Cerebral Palsy

Mauro César de Morais Filho, Cátia M. Kawamura, José A.F. Lopes, Ageu de O. Saraiva, Marcelo H. Fujino
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rectus femoris transfer (RFT) outcomes in cerebral palsy (CP) are often analyzed using 3-dimensional gait analysis, but there is limited patient-reported data on this procedure. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between changes in walking ability, measured by the Functional Assessment Questionnaire (FAQ), and knee range of motion (KRM) improvements following distal RFT in CP. METHODS: Data from a gait laboratory database (January 2002 to April 2022) were reviewed. Patients with spastic diplegic CP classified as GMFCS levels I to III who underwent RFT with pre- and postoperative gait analyses were included. Ninety-eight patients met the criteria and were divided into 3 groups based on KRM changes post-RFT: (1) reduction (RG): decrease >1 SD, (2) unchanged (UG): changes within ±1 SD, and (3) improvement (IG): increase >1 SD. Demographics, kinematics, the Gait Deviation Index (GDI), and FAQ scores were analyzed and compared among groups. RESULTS: Postsurgery, KRM decreased in 6 patients (6.1%), remained unchanged in 69 (70.4%), and improved in 23 (23.5%). RG was excluded from comparisons due to the small sample size. There were no significant between-group differences in age at surgery (UG: 14.32 y; IG: 14.32 y), follow-up duration (UG: 3.17 y; IG: 2.70 y), change in GDI (UG: +8.14; IG: +11.07), increase in peak knee flexion during the swing phase (UG: +6.44 degrees; IG: +7.34 degrees), or change in walking ability as measured by the FAQ (UG: +0.79; IG: -0.08). In contrast, minimum knee flexion during the stance phase decreased in IG (-14.32 degrees) and increased in UG (+4.78 degrees), with a significant between-group difference (P<0.001). The prevalence of surgical procedures performed concomitantly with RFT was similar between the UG and IG groups, except for surgical lengthening of the hip adductors, which was observed in 13% of patients in UG and 34.8% in IG (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in kinematic parameters alone may not predict patient-reported functional gains. In the present study, increased KRM after RFT was not associated with improved FAQ walking ability, as FAQ scores were similar regardless of whether KRM increased. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics
United Cerebral Palsy (US), American Academy of Cosmetic Dentistry (US), Associação de Assistência à Criança Deficiente (BR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.