Perceptions and Use of Clinical Practice Guidelines in Psychosocial Oncology—A Pan-Canadian Survey of Mental Health and Social Service Professionals

Rising cancer incidence and survival rates have led to an unprecedented demand for psychosocial care. Yet, limited financial and practical resources present a barrier to the provision of evidence-based care. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are well-positioned to enhance the quality and efficiency of psychosocial oncology care; however, little is known about their use and perceptions in the field. The present study explored the use and perceptions of CPGs among 172 Canadian psychosocial oncology clinicians via a cross-sectional, online survey. Findings revealed substantial variation in awareness, with over 20% of participants reporting no familiarity with CPGs, and low to moderate use of CPGs (M = 2.97, SD = 2.96) among users. Key barriers included a lack of formal training, limited applicability to local contexts, and systemic constraints such as high workloads. Conversely, participants highly endorsed facilitators, including accessible training programs, relevant tools/interventions, and greater institutional and community engagement. Clinician perspectives are paramount to the dissemination and implementation of psychosocial oncology CPGs. Our findings suggest that successful implementation requires broader accessibility, widespread adaptation, and greater community engagement. By addressing these systemic constraints, CPGs may be better positioned to bridge the gap between evidence and real-world service provision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Oncology
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33070380
Primary Topic
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceptions and Use of Clinical Practice Guidelines in Psychosocial Oncology—A Pan-Canadian Survey of Mental Health and Social Service Professionals

Martin Drapeau, Catherine Bergeron, Carmen G. Loiselle, Annett Körner
Current Oncology
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
article

Perceptions and Use of Clinical Practice Guidelines in Psychosocial Oncology—A Pan-Canadian Survey of Mental Health and Social Service Professionals

Martin Drapeau, Catherine Bergeron, Carmen G. Loiselle, Annett Körner
article en

Abstract

Rising cancer incidence and survival rates have led to an unprecedented demand for psychosocial care. Yet, limited financial and practical resources present a barrier to the provision of evidence-based care. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are well-positioned to enhance the quality and efficiency of psychosocial oncology care; however, little is known about their use and perceptions in the field. The present study explored the use and perceptions of CPGs among 172 Canadian psychosocial oncology clinicians via a cross-sectional, online survey. Findings revealed substantial variation in awareness, with over 20% of participants reporting no familiarity with CPGs, and low to moderate use of CPGs (M = 2.97, SD = 2.96) among users. Key barriers included a lack of formal training, limited applicability to local contexts, and systemic constraints such as high workloads. Conversely, participants highly endorsed facilitators, including accessible training programs, relevant tools/interventions, and greater institutional and community engagement. Clinician perspectives are paramount to the dissemination and implementation of psychosocial oncology CPGs. Our findings suggest that successful implementation requires broader accessibility, widespread adaptation, and greater community engagement. By addressing these systemic constraints, CPGs may be better positioned to bridge the gap between evidence and real-world service provision.

Current OncologyVol. 33(7)
McGill University Health Centre (CA), Jewish General Hospital (CA), McGill University (CA)
McGill University, Réseau de cancérologie Rossy, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.