Men’s Experiences and Decision-Making in Erectile Dysfunction Treatment: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis

This paper presents a qualitative evidence synthesis investigating men’s clinical experiences, psychosocial challenges, and decision-making related to help-seeking and treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED). The findings suggest that ED affects relationship experiences, self-esteem, psychosocial well-being, and help-seeking behaviors. Studies identified through Scopus, PubMed, and PsycINFO were synthesized qualitatively, focusing on adult men’s experiences of ED, disclosure, treatment engagement, and decision-making. The review protocol was not prospectively registered. Searches were conducted in March 2026, and the included studies represented diverse clinical contexts, including general ED care, diabetes care, cancer survivorship, and cardiovascular rehabilitation. Eight qualitative studies involving 209 participants were included, and four major themes emerged: masculinity, stigma, and self-silencing; relational consequences influencing help-seeking and disclosure; healthcare communication as a barrier or facilitator to care; and treatment trade-offs, adherence, and acceptability. Men frequently reported negative effects on emotional well-being and help-seeking behaviors due to ED. Delay and hesitation in disclosure and help-seeking were attributed to fear of judgment, lack of support, and negative effects on confidence and self-esteem. Participants valued respectful communication from healthcare professionals and preferred supportive, individualized approaches that included relationship support. Decisions to seek treatment were influenced not only by perceived effectiveness but also by side effects, emotional burden, relationship concerns, and communication experiences. The findings should be interpreted with consideration of the limited number of included studies and the restriction to English-language publications. These findings suggest that ED care should incorporate respectful, stigma-sensitive communication and individualized counseling to facilitate treatment-seeking and improve treatment engagement.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.111413
Primary Topic
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Men’s Experiences and Decision-Making in Erectile Dysfunction Treatment: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis

Amer Hussain, Anayat Ullah, Taha Chaudhry
Cureus
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
article

Men’s Experiences and Decision-Making in Erectile Dysfunction Treatment: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis

Amer Hussain, Anayat Ullah, Taha Chaudhry
article en

Abstract

This paper presents a qualitative evidence synthesis investigating men’s clinical experiences, psychosocial challenges, and decision-making related to help-seeking and treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED). The findings suggest that ED affects relationship experiences, self-esteem, psychosocial well-being, and help-seeking behaviors. Studies identified through Scopus, PubMed, and PsycINFO were synthesized qualitatively, focusing on adult men’s experiences of ED, disclosure, treatment engagement, and decision-making. The review protocol was not prospectively registered. Searches were conducted in March 2026, and the included studies represented diverse clinical contexts, including general ED care, diabetes care, cancer survivorship, and cardiovascular rehabilitation. Eight qualitative studies involving 209 participants were included, and four major themes emerged: masculinity, stigma, and self-silencing; relational consequences influencing help-seeking and disclosure; healthcare communication as a barrier or facilitator to care; and treatment trade-offs, adherence, and acceptability. Men frequently reported negative effects on emotional well-being and help-seeking behaviors due to ED. Delay and hesitation in disclosure and help-seeking were attributed to fear of judgment, lack of support, and negative effects on confidence and self-esteem. Participants valued respectful communication from healthcare professionals and preferred supportive, individualized approaches that included relationship support. Decisions to seek treatment were influenced not only by perceived effectiveness but also by side effects, emotional burden, relationship concerns, and communication experiences. The findings should be interpreted with consideration of the limited number of included studies and the restriction to English-language publications. These findings suggest that ED care should incorporate respectful, stigma-sensitive communication and individualized counseling to facilitate treatment-seeking and improve treatment engagement.

Cureus
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Men’s Experiences and Decision-Making in Erectile Dysfunction Treatment: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis — Amer Hussain, Anayat Ullah, et al. · Cureus (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS