NUCLEAR GRAVITY, QUANTUM VACUUM, AND MODAL DISCIPLINE: a critical-propositional analysis of Nuclear Quantum Gravity + Superconducting Field Theory in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity

This article presents a critical-propositional analysis of Sergio Perez Felipe’s The Nuclear Quantum Gravity + Superconducting Field Theory (ToE) (2026), published in OAJ Materials and Devices under DOI https://doi.org/10.23647/ca.md20262001, in dialogue with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). The study examines Perez Felipe’s proposal that the strong nuclear force may contract or deform the quantum vacuum, generating the gravitational effect, while the quantum vacuum is interpreted as a superconducting, metastable, and structured medium capable of sustaining motion, electromagnetic phenomena, dark matter, dark energy, and cosmological expansion. In confrontation with the foundational and recent bibliography of the Theory of Objectivity, the article identifies important compatibilities: gravity as an emergent phenomenon, the centrality of nuclear relations, the role of the hydrogen/protonic unit, the active status of the vacuum, and the relation between contraction and expansion as possible expressions of TO’s Inducer Effects. It also identifies tensions concerning modal necessity, the distinction between quantum vacuum and logical Nothing, the physical derivation of gravity from the strong interaction, and the continued dependence on a Big Bang framework. The analysis argues that Perez Felipe’s model offers a fertile physical vocabulary for dialogue with TO, especially when interpreted through phenomenic elements, cosmological Eras, the cosmogonic theorem, and the TO thesis that transcendent information is produced in atomic relations and is equivalent to atomic radiation. This analytical text received analytical support from ChatGPT. Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; Vidamor Cabannas; Denivaldo Silva; Nuclear Quantum Gravity; Superconducting Field Theory; Sergio Perez Felipe; quantum vacuum; strong nuclear force; modal discipline; logical Nothing; Inducer Effects; radiation-information; atomic radiation; hydrogen; proton; dark matter; dark energy; cosmology; critical-propositional analysis; ChatGPT.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20835310
Primary Topic
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

NUCLEAR GRAVITY, QUANTUM VACUUM, AND MODAL DISCIPLINE: a critical-propositional analysis of Nuclear Quantum Gravity + Superconducting Field Theory in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity

Denivaldo Silva, Vidamor Cabannas
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
article

NUCLEAR GRAVITY, QUANTUM VACUUM, AND MODAL DISCIPLINE: a critical-propositional analysis of Nuclear Quantum Gravity + Superconducting Field Theory in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity

Denivaldo Silva, Vidamor Cabannas
article en

Abstract

This article presents a critical-propositional analysis of Sergio Perez Felipe’s The Nuclear Quantum Gravity + Superconducting Field Theory (ToE) (2026), published in OAJ Materials and Devices under DOI https://doi.org/10.23647/ca.md20262001, in dialogue with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). The study examines Perez Felipe’s proposal that the strong nuclear force may contract or deform the quantum vacuum, generating the gravitational effect, while the quantum vacuum is interpreted as a superconducting, metastable, and structured medium capable of sustaining motion, electromagnetic phenomena, dark matter, dark energy, and cosmological expansion. In confrontation with the foundational and recent bibliography of the Theory of Objectivity, the article identifies important compatibilities: gravity as an emergent phenomenon, the centrality of nuclear relations, the role of the hydrogen/protonic unit, the active status of the vacuum, and the relation between contraction and expansion as possible expressions of TO’s Inducer Effects. It also identifies tensions concerning modal necessity, the distinction between quantum vacuum and logical Nothing, the physical derivation of gravity from the strong interaction, and the continued dependence on a Big Bang framework. The analysis argues that Perez Felipe’s model offers a fertile physical vocabulary for dialogue with TO, especially when interpreted through phenomenic elements, cosmological Eras, the cosmogonic theorem, and the TO thesis that transcendent information is produced in atomic relations and is equivalent to atomic radiation. This analytical text received analytical support from ChatGPT. Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; Vidamor Cabannas; Denivaldo Silva; Nuclear Quantum Gravity; Superconducting Field Theory; Sergio Perez Felipe; quantum vacuum; strong nuclear force; modal discipline; logical Nothing; Inducer Effects; radiation-information; atomic radiation; hydrogen; proton; dark matter; dark energy; cosmology; critical-propositional analysis; ChatGPT.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

NUCLEAR GRAVITY, QUANTUM VACUUM, AND MODAL DISCIPLINE: a critical-propositional analysis of Nuclear Quantum Gravity + Superconducting Field Theory in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity — Denivaldo Silva, Vidamor Cabannas · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS