Identifying and mitigating bias in multiple aspects of modern clinical research
In clinical research, bias is a systematic error that creates a difference between observed and true values. The increasing use of large datasets and artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine necessitates a renewed focus on how such errors can be introduced and propagated.This educational primer provides a consolidated framework of the three primary types of bias selection, information, and confounding/analytical. We synthesize these concepts for an interdisciplinary audience of clinicians and data scientists, using illustrative examples from both traditional clinical trials and modern, data-intensive research. Bias can arise at every stage of the research lifecycle: design, conduct, analysis, reporting, and dissemination. We illustrate how classic issues, such as selection bias (systematic differences between those included and those eligible/targeted, thus distorting effect estimates), manifest in data and how modern analytical methods can introduce novel forms of error if not carefully managed. A shared understanding of bias is essential for effective collaboration between clinical and data science teams. This primer offers a practical conceptual map to help these teams proactively identify, mitigate, and transparently report on potential sources of bias, ultimately fostering more robust and equitable clinical evidence.
Authors
- Geerthy Thambiraj (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3056-8655)
- Antonis A. Armoundas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5006-1547)
Institutions
- Broad Institute (US)
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Communications Medicine
- Published
- 2026-06-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-026-01721-4
- Primary Topic
- Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- American Heart Association
- National Institutes of Health