A Structured Domain Model for Organizational AI Adoption

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) adoption is increasingly reported as a priority for organizations, yet they face a growing, fragmented body of evidence concerning the factors that influence successful AI integration. Method: To identify the relevant factors for organizational AI adoption, we conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) following PRISMA guidelines, which yielded 37 quantitative empirical studies. From these studies we extracted 1229 paper-item instances, of which 810 were retained after applying structured exclusion criteria to develop a domain model relevant to organizational AI adoption. The model’s content validity was assessed and supported through expert feedback using the Content Validity Index (CVI) methodology. Results: We organized 24 subclusters into nine main clusters across the three dimensions Technology (Enablers, Usability, Trust), Organization (Leadership, People, Process), and Environment (Market, Regulatory, Partner). Our analysis suggests that workforce skills, perceived intelligence, and resources are among the most frequently studied and positively associated antecedents of AI adoption, and that constructs related to AI explainability and control (human-in-the-loop oversight) have received little research attention and remain underrepresented despite growing regulatory requirements such as the EU AI Act. Conclusions: The resulting domain model provides an empirically grounded classification of organizational AI adoption factors and can serve as a foundation for future measurement instruments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ai7070235
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Structured Domain Model for Organizational AI Adoption

Mario Gellrich, Tim Geppert, Andreas Block, Maria Rothstein
AI
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

A Structured Domain Model for Organizational AI Adoption

Mario Gellrich, Tim Geppert, Andreas Block, Maria Rothstein
article en

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) adoption is increasingly reported as a priority for organizations, yet they face a growing, fragmented body of evidence concerning the factors that influence successful AI integration. Method: To identify the relevant factors for organizational AI adoption, we conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) following PRISMA guidelines, which yielded 37 quantitative empirical studies. From these studies we extracted 1229 paper-item instances, of which 810 were retained after applying structured exclusion criteria to develop a domain model relevant to organizational AI adoption. The model’s content validity was assessed and supported through expert feedback using the Content Validity Index (CVI) methodology. Results: We organized 24 subclusters into nine main clusters across the three dimensions Technology (Enablers, Usability, Trust), Organization (Leadership, People, Process), and Environment (Market, Regulatory, Partner). Our analysis suggests that workforce skills, perceived intelligence, and resources are among the most frequently studied and positively associated antecedents of AI adoption, and that constructs related to AI explainability and control (human-in-the-loop oversight) have received little research attention and remain underrepresented despite growing regulatory requirements such as the EU AI Act. Conclusions: The resulting domain model provides an empirically grounded classification of organizational AI adoption factors and can serve as a foundation for future measurement instruments.

AIVol. 7(7)
ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences (CH)
Innosuisse - Schweizerische Agentur für Innovationsförderung
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.