A Strong-Field Observability Rubric for Modified Gravity: From Formal Wave Solutions to Binary-Merger Predictions Case Study: Spin-1 Hamiltonian Composite Gravity

This manuscript proposes a strong-field observability rubric for modified and alternative theories of gravity. The rubric is designed to distinguish formal mathematical structures - such as wave equations, static metrics, or linear perturbations - from observationally closed binary-merger predictions. It complements weak-field frameworks such as the parametrized post-Newtonian formalism by specifying the additional source-native closure chain needed for gravitational-wave claims: matter coupling, detector response, native radiation flux, low-order radiation cancellation or bounds, inspiral phasing, ringdown spectra, causal propagation, and quantum closure when quantum stability is claimed. The paper calibrates the rubric against the classical general-relativistic binary-merger program and explicitly scopes the rubric as an inductive, source-native closure checklist rather than a theorem or replacement for weaker exploratory tools. The rubric is then applied as a case study to a recent Hamiltonian composite theory of gravitation built from tetrads and Lorentz Yang-Mills-type gauge fields. The case-study theory constructs an effective metric from tetrads, interprets planar gravitational waves as spin-1 gauge-vector modes, and presents a static black-hole-like solution with tetrad sign reversal. The audit finds that strict application of the rubric halts at the matter-coupling milestone: the source theory does not derive the matter action or test-mass response needed to convert field variables into detector motion. Downstream milestones remain open, including native compact-binary flux, low-order vector-radiation cancellation or bounds, inspiral phasing, ringdown quasi-normal modes, tetrad causality, and Ward-identity/quantum closure. The result is not a falsification claim. It is a closure classification: the case-study theory has not yet earned binary-merger observability under the proposed rubric. The manuscript includes an appendix giving a conditional tetrad-to-strain map, explicitly quarantined as a hypothetical downstream result that applies only if matter coupling is later closed by a metric-response law. Files Included: main_v100.pdf — Final compiled manuscript. main_v100.tex — REVTeX 4.2 source file. strong_field_rubric_v100_release.zip — Reproducibility bundle containing the compiled PDF, LaTeX source, compile report, SHA256 checksums, and rendered PDF contact sheet.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20836034
Primary Topic
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

A Strong-Field Observability Rubric for Modified Gravity: From Formal Wave Solutions to Binary-Merger Predictions Case Study: Spin-1 Hamiltonian Composite Gravity

Darren Dominic Fabri
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
preprint

A Strong-Field Observability Rubric for Modified Gravity: From Formal Wave Solutions to Binary-Merger Predictions Case Study: Spin-1 Hamiltonian Composite Gravity

Darren Dominic Fabri
preprint en

Abstract

This manuscript proposes a strong-field observability rubric for modified and alternative theories of gravity. The rubric is designed to distinguish formal mathematical structures - such as wave equations, static metrics, or linear perturbations - from observationally closed binary-merger predictions. It complements weak-field frameworks such as the parametrized post-Newtonian formalism by specifying the additional source-native closure chain needed for gravitational-wave claims: matter coupling, detector response, native radiation flux, low-order radiation cancellation or bounds, inspiral phasing, ringdown spectra, causal propagation, and quantum closure when quantum stability is claimed. The paper calibrates the rubric against the classical general-relativistic binary-merger program and explicitly scopes the rubric as an inductive, source-native closure checklist rather than a theorem or replacement for weaker exploratory tools. The rubric is then applied as a case study to a recent Hamiltonian composite theory of gravitation built from tetrads and Lorentz Yang-Mills-type gauge fields. The case-study theory constructs an effective metric from tetrads, interprets planar gravitational waves as spin-1 gauge-vector modes, and presents a static black-hole-like solution with tetrad sign reversal. The audit finds that strict application of the rubric halts at the matter-coupling milestone: the source theory does not derive the matter action or test-mass response needed to convert field variables into detector motion. Downstream milestones remain open, including native compact-binary flux, low-order vector-radiation cancellation or bounds, inspiral phasing, ringdown quasi-normal modes, tetrad causality, and Ward-identity/quantum closure. The result is not a falsification claim. It is a closure classification: the case-study theory has not yet earned binary-merger observability under the proposed rubric. The manuscript includes an appendix giving a conditional tetrad-to-strain map, explicitly quarantined as a hypothetical downstream result that applies only if matter coupling is later closed by a metric-response law. Files Included: main_v100.pdf — Final compiled manuscript. main_v100.tex — REVTeX 4.2 source file. strong_field_rubric_v100_release.zip — Reproducibility bundle containing the compiled PDF, LaTeX source, compile report, SHA256 checksums, and rendered PDF contact sheet.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.