Juristic perspectives of Islamic swaps: an assessment from selected Shariah resolutions

Purpose This paper evaluates the juristic perspective on Islamic swaps and comparatively examines their underlying rationale through a synthesis of selected Shariah resolutions and literature. This paper aims to bridge the gap between conceptual discourse and regulatory treatment by identifying the absence of a unified juristic framework grounded in Maqasid al-Shariah. Design/methodology/approach A non-systematic review with targeted retrieval was conducted, complemented by a structured analysis of selected Shariah resolutions issued by international and Malaysian authorities. This approach uses clear inclusion criteria and a multi-tiered sourcing strategy to support a rigorous evaluation despite the limited availability of specific academic literature. Findings This study reveals that discussions on Islamic swaps are predominantly theoretical, lacking in technical depth and mostly derived from general Shariah principles on derivatives. It identifies a distinct “regulatory-academic asynchrony,” where institutional operationalization has outpaced scholarly deliberation. There is no dedicated Shariah resolution addressing Islamic swaps specifically, except within the context of the Tahawwut Master Agreement. This paper clarifies ambiguities regarding speculation and contract structure, proposing a maqasid-based evaluative lens for future regulatory development. Research limitations/implications Academic literature directly addressing Islamic swaps remains limited, with the search window anchored to the 2022 research date to capture the evolution of post-2008 hedging discourse. This limitation reinforces the need for further focused research on the technical and juristic dimensions of Islamic swap structures. Originality/value This study contributes to a structured assessment of the fragmented juristic discourse on Islamic swaps, providing valuable insights to both scholars and industry practitioners. It uniquely consolidates scattered references into a focused review, thus facilitating the development of a more coherent Shariah framework for Islamic derivatives. This fills a significant gap noted in previous works and encourages further applied Shariah research in financial innovation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Islamic accounting and business research
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jiabr-11-2024-0459
Primary Topic
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Juristic perspectives of Islamic swaps: an assessment from selected Shariah resolutions

Bouhedda Ghalia, Nasrun Mohamad Ghazali, Syed Musa Syed Jaafar Alhabshi, Mohd. Fuad Md. Sawari
Journal of Islamic accounting and business research
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
article

Juristic perspectives of Islamic swaps: an assessment from selected Shariah resolutions

Bouhedda Ghalia, Nasrun Mohamad Ghazali, Syed Musa Syed Jaafar Alhabshi, Mohd. Fuad Md. Sawari
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper evaluates the juristic perspective on Islamic swaps and comparatively examines their underlying rationale through a synthesis of selected Shariah resolutions and literature. This paper aims to bridge the gap between conceptual discourse and regulatory treatment by identifying the absence of a unified juristic framework grounded in Maqasid al-Shariah. Design/methodology/approach A non-systematic review with targeted retrieval was conducted, complemented by a structured analysis of selected Shariah resolutions issued by international and Malaysian authorities. This approach uses clear inclusion criteria and a multi-tiered sourcing strategy to support a rigorous evaluation despite the limited availability of specific academic literature. Findings This study reveals that discussions on Islamic swaps are predominantly theoretical, lacking in technical depth and mostly derived from general Shariah principles on derivatives. It identifies a distinct “regulatory-academic asynchrony,” where institutional operationalization has outpaced scholarly deliberation. There is no dedicated Shariah resolution addressing Islamic swaps specifically, except within the context of the Tahawwut Master Agreement. This paper clarifies ambiguities regarding speculation and contract structure, proposing a maqasid-based evaluative lens for future regulatory development. Research limitations/implications Academic literature directly addressing Islamic swaps remains limited, with the search window anchored to the 2022 research date to capture the evolution of post-2008 hedging discourse. This limitation reinforces the need for further focused research on the technical and juristic dimensions of Islamic swap structures. Originality/value This study contributes to a structured assessment of the fragmented juristic discourse on Islamic swaps, providing valuable insights to both scholars and industry practitioners. It uniquely consolidates scattered references into a focused review, thus facilitating the development of a more coherent Shariah framework for Islamic derivatives. This fills a significant gap noted in previous works and encourages further applied Shariah research in financial innovation.

Journal of Islamic accounting and business research
International Centre for Education in Islamic Finance (MY), International Islamic University Malaysia (MY), Universiti Teknologi MARA (MY)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.