Determinants of survival benefit from endobiliary radiofrequency ablation for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma according to tumor stage, systemic therapy, and session number

Background: Endobiliary radiofrequency ablation (EB-RFA) has emerged as a promising adjunct capable of prolonging survival in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (eCCA), though its clinical utility remains unclear. Key unresolved issues include the impact of metastatic status, systemic therapy, and the number of ablation sessions on EB-RFA effectiveness. In this study, we aimed to address these factors to define the role and indications for EB-RFA better. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study included 336 patients with unresectable eCCA who underwent endoscopic biliary stenting with (n=121) or without (n=215) EB-RFA. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), which was analyzed separately for patients with and without distant metastases. Results: Among patients without distant metastases, EB-RFA significantly improved OS compared to stenting alone (median 527 vs. 300 days, P<0.001), regardless of systemic therapy (with systemic therapy: 611 vs. 344 days, P=0.005; without systemic therapy: 415 vs. 282 days, P=0.040). Patients who received multiple EB-RFA sessions (≥2) had the longest OS (573 days), followed by those who received single sessions (426 days) and those without ablation (300 days) (P=0.002). No OS benefit was observed in patients with distant metastases. However, among those receiving systemic therapy, multiple EB-RFA sessions significantly improved OS compared to non-ablation (274 vs. 163 days, P=0.044). Adverse event rates were comparable between patients with and without EB-RFA. Conclusions: EB-RFA significantly improved the survival of patients with locoregional eCCA. In cases of metastasis, multiple sessions may offer additional benefits when combined with systemic therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Endoscopy International Open
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2900-1143
Primary Topic
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determinants of survival benefit from endobiliary radiofrequency ablation for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma according to tumor stage, systemic therapy, and session number

Rena Kitano, Masato Yano, Tadahisa Inoue, Itaru Naitoh et al.
Endoscopy International Open
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
article

Determinants of survival benefit from endobiliary radiofrequency ablation for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma according to tumor stage, systemic therapy, and session number

Rena Kitano, Masato Yano, Tadahisa Inoue, Itaru Naitoh, Soh Futagami, Kenta Kachi, Michihiro Yoshida, Tomoya Kitada, Fumihiro Okumura, Naoaki Yamada
article en

Abstract

Background: Endobiliary radiofrequency ablation (EB-RFA) has emerged as a promising adjunct capable of prolonging survival in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (eCCA), though its clinical utility remains unclear. Key unresolved issues include the impact of metastatic status, systemic therapy, and the number of ablation sessions on EB-RFA effectiveness. In this study, we aimed to address these factors to define the role and indications for EB-RFA better. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study included 336 patients with unresectable eCCA who underwent endoscopic biliary stenting with (n=121) or without (n=215) EB-RFA. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), which was analyzed separately for patients with and without distant metastases. Results: Among patients without distant metastases, EB-RFA significantly improved OS compared to stenting alone (median 527 vs. 300 days, P<0.001), regardless of systemic therapy (with systemic therapy: 611 vs. 344 days, P=0.005; without systemic therapy: 415 vs. 282 days, P=0.040). Patients who received multiple EB-RFA sessions (≥2) had the longest OS (573 days), followed by those who received single sessions (426 days) and those without ablation (300 days) (P=0.002). No OS benefit was observed in patients with distant metastases. However, among those receiving systemic therapy, multiple EB-RFA sessions significantly improved OS compared to non-ablation (274 vs. 163 days, P=0.044). Adverse event rates were comparable between patients with and without EB-RFA. Conclusions: EB-RFA significantly improved the survival of patients with locoregional eCCA. In cases of metastasis, multiple sessions may offer additional benefits when combined with systemic therapy.

Endoscopy International Open
Aichi Medical University (JP), Nagoya City University (JP), Gifu Prefectural Tajimi Hospital (JP), Nagoya City University Hospital (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.