Measuring New Venture Legitimacy: A Multi‐dimensional Approach Using Computational Textual Analysis

Abstract Legitimacy is critical for the growth, survival and performance of ventures, yet efforts to measure legitimacy empirically typically focus on a single dimension of this multi‐dimensional construct. In this article, we develop a multi‐dimensional framework for measuring legitimacy using computational text analysis. We begin by elaborating the theoretical foundations of our multi‐dimensional approach, situating it in relation to influential multi‐level perspectives on legitimacy. Using dyads as our unit of analysis, we show how our approach enables simultaneous measurement of multiple dimensions of legitimacy across multiple audiences at scale. This approach provides a methodological bridge between dominant uni‐dimensional approaches to the empirical study of legitimacy, generating both a composite measure of legitimacy and indicators for each dimension individually, which can be incorporated into empirical analyses. We validate the measure using both expert evaluations and by demonstrating its predictive power for venture failure. Our study offers both a methodological advance for legitimacy research and a foundation for new theory building on how legitimacy emerges, evolves and influences outcomes not only across multiple levels but also across multiple dimensions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Management
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.70089
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring New Venture Legitimacy: A Multi‐dimensional Approach Using Computational Textual Analysis

Bénédicte Aldebert, Eric W. Schoon, Ali Ghods, Antonin Ricard
British Journal of Management
Management and Organizational Studies
article

Measuring New Venture Legitimacy: A Multi‐dimensional Approach Using Computational Textual Analysis

Bénédicte Aldebert, Eric W. Schoon, Ali Ghods, Antonin Ricard
article en

Abstract

Abstract Legitimacy is critical for the growth, survival and performance of ventures, yet efforts to measure legitimacy empirically typically focus on a single dimension of this multi‐dimensional construct. In this article, we develop a multi‐dimensional framework for measuring legitimacy using computational text analysis. We begin by elaborating the theoretical foundations of our multi‐dimensional approach, situating it in relation to influential multi‐level perspectives on legitimacy. Using dyads as our unit of analysis, we show how our approach enables simultaneous measurement of multiple dimensions of legitimacy across multiple audiences at scale. This approach provides a methodological bridge between dominant uni‐dimensional approaches to the empirical study of legitimacy, generating both a composite measure of legitimacy and indicators for each dimension individually, which can be incorporated into empirical analyses. We validate the measure using both expert evaluations and by demonstrating its predictive power for venture failure. Our study offers both a methodological advance for legitimacy research and a foundation for new theory building on how legitimacy emerges, evolves and influences outcomes not only across multiple levels but also across multiple dimensions.

British Journal of Management
Aix-Marseille Université (FR), Centre de Recherche et d’Enseignement de Géosciences de l’Environnement (FR), The Ohio State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Management and Organizational Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.