Using a Special Regressor to Identify Type I and Type II Error Probabilities, With an Illustrative Application to Miscarriages of Justice

We nonparametrically identify Type I and Type II error rates when mistakes are unobserved. Our strategy reframes the setting as a misclassified binary choice model, using a special regressor to identify the misclassification probabilities. Identification requires an exclusion restriction and a large support condition. When the exclusion restriction is in doubt, we show how our estimands can be interpreted as bounds under a weaker monotonicity condition. Bounds are also provided when the large support condition is violated. We apply our method to estimate miscarriages of justice in Virginia. Among defendants who proceeded to trial, the estimated probability of wrongful acquittal ranges from 18 to 42%, depending on offense type, race, and gender. Our method also produces estimates of wrongful conviction probabilities; however, these are very high, potentially reflecting the restriction of our sample to trial defendants and/or violations of key assumptions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business and Economic Statistics
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2026.2654891
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using a Special Regressor to Identify Type I and Type II Error Probabilities, With an Illustrative Application to Miscarriages of Justice

Shin Kanaya, Luke Taylor
Journal of Business and Economic Statistics
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
article

Using a Special Regressor to Identify Type I and Type II Error Probabilities, With an Illustrative Application to Miscarriages of Justice

Shin Kanaya, Luke Taylor
article en

Abstract

We nonparametrically identify Type I and Type II error rates when mistakes are unobserved. Our strategy reframes the setting as a misclassified binary choice model, using a special regressor to identify the misclassification probabilities. Identification requires an exclusion restriction and a large support condition. When the exclusion restriction is in doubt, we show how our estimands can be interpreted as bounds under a weaker monotonicity condition. Bounds are also provided when the large support condition is violated. We apply our method to estimate miscarriages of justice in Virginia. Among defendants who proceeded to trial, the estimated probability of wrongful acquittal ranges from 18 to 42%, depending on offense type, race, and gender. Our method also produces estimates of wrongful conviction probabilities; however, these are very high, potentially reflecting the restriction of our sample to trial defendants and/or violations of key assumptions.

Journal of Business and Economic Statistics
University of Essex (GB), Aarhus University (DK), Kyoto University (JP), Institute of Economic Research of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK)
Danmarks Grundforskningsfond, Aarhus Universitets Forskningsfond, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.