Generativity Under Power: Trust, Asymmetry, and Estrangement in Intimate Relations

This paper asks how love fares under power. Where the Philosophy of Intimacy and the Theory of Justice series has theorised intimate relation as a generative process—a coupling out of which value is generated rather than extracted—it developed that account, in effect, in a clearing, leaving unconfronted the field of asymmetries that can deform, capture, and freeze the very generativity it describes. The paper confronts power directly, through three questions and one object. The object is love, in the precise sense of the dynamics of the real between two subjects —what circles the unsymbolisable and cannot be counted, traded, or managed. The questions ascend: how love creates a world (the generative-relational being, here extended by an etiol ogy of estrangement); how love is preserved from destruction by power (a theory of international relations reconstructed away from its realist core, toward the order-problem of opaque subjects under no authority); and how love becomes free within history (a dialectical historical materialism). Its central claim is that the tools of power can protect the conditions of love but never produce love itself—a political economy ofconditions, neveroflove—withtrust the sole interface across the two levels. Two further claims follow: that estrangement is, in the first instance, a necessary moment of aliving bondrather than its failure; and that a generative relation does not oppose power but the freezing of power.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17613/g2ndx-57n50
Primary Topic
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generativity Under Power: Trust, Asymmetry, and Estrangement in Intimate Relations

Wanhong HUANG
Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
article

Generativity Under Power: Trust, Asymmetry, and Estrangement in Intimate Relations

Wanhong HUANG
article en

Abstract

This paper asks how love fares under power. Where the Philosophy of Intimacy and the Theory of Justice series has theorised intimate relation as a generative process—a coupling out of which value is generated rather than extracted—it developed that account, in effect, in a clearing, leaving unconfronted the field of asymmetries that can deform, capture, and freeze the very generativity it describes. The paper confronts power directly, through three questions and one object. The object is love, in the precise sense of the dynamics of the real between two subjects —what circles the unsymbolisable and cannot be counted, traded, or managed. The questions ascend: how love creates a world (the generative-relational being, here extended by an etiol ogy of estrangement); how love is preserved from destruction by power (a theory of international relations reconstructed away from its realist core, toward the order-problem of opaque subjects under no authority); and how love becomes free within history (a dialectical historical materialism). Its central claim is that the tools of power can protect the conditions of love but never produce love itself—a political economy ofconditions, neveroflove—withtrust the sole interface across the two levels. Two further claims follow: that estrangement is, in the first instance, a necessary moment of aliving bondrather than its failure; and that a generative relation does not oppose power but the freezing of power.

Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Creative Commons (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.