Comparative efficacy and harms of adjuvant whole breast hypofractionation or external beam accelerated partial breast irradiation for treatment of breast cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Whole breast moderate hypofractionation is recommended for most breast cancer populations to improve survival and reduce recurrence. Whole breast ultra-hypofractionation and external beam accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) may reduce toxicity while maintaining benefits. METHODS: MEDLINE and Embase searches through March 2024 identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating adjuvant external beam hypofractionated radiation therapy for breast cancer. Eligibility and risk of bias (RoB) were assessed by two reviewers and required consensus. For prioritized outcomes (e.g., overall survival, acute toxicity), certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. RESULTS: Thirty-nine RCTs compared whole breast moderate hypofractionation vs. conventional radiation (CFRT; k = 25); whole breast ultra-hypofractionation vs. moderate hypofractionation or CFRT (k = 8); or external beam APBI vs. whole breast radiation (k = 6). For all comparisons, there were low RoB, large trials (N > 2,000) with 5-10 year outcomes. Trials on ultra-hypofractionation and APBI focused on early stage cancer, some also including ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). High survival (> 90%) and low recurrence were found across all treatments. Moderate hypofractionation probably results in less overall acute toxicity, but makes little to no difference in specific adverse events. No trial on ultra-hypofractionation reported overall toxicity; evidence on acute skin toxicity is very uncertain. APBI probably results in less overall acute toxicity, but may result in more overall late toxicity; evidence was very uncertain or showed no difference for specific events. CONCLUSION: Radiation treatments had similar survival and recurrence. Moderate hypofractionation and APBI result in lower overall acute toxicity, but evidence is lacking for ultra-hypofractionation. For ultra-hypofractionation and APBI, future research is needed to better understand late toxicity outcomes, and whether effects may vary across settings and subgroups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Cancer
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-026-16129-5
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative efficacy and harms of adjuvant whole breast hypofractionation or external beam accelerated partial breast irradiation for treatment of breast cancer: a systematic review

Philipp Dahm, Catherine Sowerby, Timothy J Wilt, Maylen Anthony et al.
BMC Cancer
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Comparative efficacy and harms of adjuvant whole breast hypofractionation or external beam accelerated partial breast irradiation for treatment of breast cancer: a systematic review

Philipp Dahm, Catherine Sowerby, Timothy J Wilt, Maylen Anthony, Kristen Ullman, Wei Duan-Porter, Adrienne Landsteiner, Kassahun Lemu, Caleb Kalinowski, Elizabeth Ester
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whole breast moderate hypofractionation is recommended for most breast cancer populations to improve survival and reduce recurrence. Whole breast ultra-hypofractionation and external beam accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) may reduce toxicity while maintaining benefits. METHODS: MEDLINE and Embase searches through March 2024 identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating adjuvant external beam hypofractionated radiation therapy for breast cancer. Eligibility and risk of bias (RoB) were assessed by two reviewers and required consensus. For prioritized outcomes (e.g., overall survival, acute toxicity), certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. RESULTS: Thirty-nine RCTs compared whole breast moderate hypofractionation vs. conventional radiation (CFRT; k = 25); whole breast ultra-hypofractionation vs. moderate hypofractionation or CFRT (k = 8); or external beam APBI vs. whole breast radiation (k = 6). For all comparisons, there were low RoB, large trials (N > 2,000) with 5-10 year outcomes. Trials on ultra-hypofractionation and APBI focused on early stage cancer, some also including ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). High survival (> 90%) and low recurrence were found across all treatments. Moderate hypofractionation probably results in less overall acute toxicity, but makes little to no difference in specific adverse events. No trial on ultra-hypofractionation reported overall toxicity; evidence on acute skin toxicity is very uncertain. APBI probably results in less overall acute toxicity, but may result in more overall late toxicity; evidence was very uncertain or showed no difference for specific events. CONCLUSION: Radiation treatments had similar survival and recurrence. Moderate hypofractionation and APBI result in lower overall acute toxicity, but evidence is lacking for ultra-hypofractionation. For ultra-hypofractionation and APBI, future research is needed to better understand late toxicity outcomes, and whether effects may vary across settings and subgroups.

BMC Cancer
University of Minnesota (US), Minneapolis VA Health Care System (US), University of Minnesota Medical Center (US), Minnesota Department of Health (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.