Beyond the sepsis label: heterogeneity, subphenotypes, and the path to precision therapy

Sepsis is increasingly recognized as a biologically heterogeneous syndrome rather than a single uniform inflammatory condition. Patients meeting the same clinical definition may differ substantially in immune competence, endothelial injury, metabolic adaptation, organ vulnerability, temporal trajectories, and likelihood of response to host-directed therapies. This narrative review synthesized relevant literature identified through PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar. Priority was given to landmark clinical and translational studies, consensus papers, methodological articles, randomized trials, secondary trial analyses, and high-quality reviews directly related to sepsis heterogeneity, subphenotypes, endotypes, immune dysfunction, multi-omics classification, machine learning-assisted stratification, and treatment-effect heterogeneity. The reviewed evidence shows that sepsis heterogeneity is reproducible across bedside clinical phenotypes, longitudinal trajectories, immune-cell-defined endotypes, transcriptomic, proteomic, metabolomic, metagenomic, and machine learning-derived classifications. Clinical models, including early pragmatic phenotypes and dynamic trajectories, are scalable and close to bedside use, whereas omics-based approaches provide deeper biological resolution but remain limited by cost, turnaround time, platform dependence, and incomplete concordance across layers. Immune low-response states, endothelial/coagulation injury, metabolic stress, organ-specific vulnerability, and PIICS-related non-resolution emerged as recurrent biological motifs. Evidence for phenotype-guided therapy, including corticosteroids, and precision immunotherapy, remains promising but largely exploratory, with most treatment-response signals requiring prospective validation. Sepsis subphenotyping should be interpreted as a staged framework for precision decision-making rather than as a competition between rival taxonomies. Future progress requires reproducible, time-sensitive, clinically measurable treatable traits that can be prospectively tested to guide therapy, organ support, trial enrichment, and long-term recovery research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Care Sepsis and Severe Infection
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s44541-026-00013-7
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond the sepsis label: heterogeneity, subphenotypes, and the path to precision therapy

Serge Chooklin, S.S. Chuklin
Critical Care Sepsis and Severe Infection
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Beyond the sepsis label: heterogeneity, subphenotypes, and the path to precision therapy

Serge Chooklin, S.S. Chuklin
article en

Abstract

Sepsis is increasingly recognized as a biologically heterogeneous syndrome rather than a single uniform inflammatory condition. Patients meeting the same clinical definition may differ substantially in immune competence, endothelial injury, metabolic adaptation, organ vulnerability, temporal trajectories, and likelihood of response to host-directed therapies. This narrative review synthesized relevant literature identified through PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar. Priority was given to landmark clinical and translational studies, consensus papers, methodological articles, randomized trials, secondary trial analyses, and high-quality reviews directly related to sepsis heterogeneity, subphenotypes, endotypes, immune dysfunction, multi-omics classification, machine learning-assisted stratification, and treatment-effect heterogeneity. The reviewed evidence shows that sepsis heterogeneity is reproducible across bedside clinical phenotypes, longitudinal trajectories, immune-cell-defined endotypes, transcriptomic, proteomic, metabolomic, metagenomic, and machine learning-derived classifications. Clinical models, including early pragmatic phenotypes and dynamic trajectories, are scalable and close to bedside use, whereas omics-based approaches provide deeper biological resolution but remain limited by cost, turnaround time, platform dependence, and incomplete concordance across layers. Immune low-response states, endothelial/coagulation injury, metabolic stress, organ-specific vulnerability, and PIICS-related non-resolution emerged as recurrent biological motifs. Evidence for phenotype-guided therapy, including corticosteroids, and precision immunotherapy, remains promising but largely exploratory, with most treatment-response signals requiring prospective validation. Sepsis subphenotyping should be interpreted as a staged framework for precision decision-making rather than as a competition between rival taxonomies. Future progress requires reproducible, time-sensitive, clinically measurable treatable traits that can be prospectively tested to guide therapy, organ support, trial enrichment, and long-term recovery research.

Critical Care Sepsis and Severe InfectionVol. 1(1)
Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.