Impact on Cost and Expert Time of Data-Efficient Deep Learning for Medical Image Segmentation

Purpose To develop and systematically evaluate an iterative training approach, termed the expert-guided annotation loop, for efficient reference standard medical image segmentation, including assessment of two sample-selection strategies and real-world clinical implementation. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included ten datasets comprising 1948 CT or MRI examinations from autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, prostate cancer, uveal melanoma, thyroid eye disease, and non-small cell lung cancer patients. nnU-Net segmentation models were iteratively trained using an expert-guided annotation loop with random or active learning-based sample selection. In each iteration, additional samples were added to the training set, and model-generated presegmentations were corrected by expert radiologists to create reference standard annotations. Expert time required for manual segmentation versus presegmentations correction was measured. Model performance and efficiency were assessed using nonparametric tests, and cost savings were estimated for kidney and tumor segmentation using probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Feasibility of end-to-end no-code implementation was evaluated. Results Fifty-seven segmentation models were trained and evaluated. Final model Dice scores ranged from 0.67–0.97 for organ segmentation and from 0.64–0.69 for lung tumor segmentation across internal and external test sets. Maximum expert time savings were 90.3% for kidney and 48.2% for tumor segmentation ( P < .001 and P = .003), corresponding to estimated per-examination cost savings of $14.30[95% CI: $5.94, $26.87] and $5.63[95% CI: $-7.26, $26.09], respectively. No-code execution of the expert-guided annotation loop was feasible. Conclusion The expert-guided annotation loop reduced expert annotation time and enabled estimated cost savings while producing high-quality reference standard CT and MRI segmentations. The no-code workflow was implemented in a clinical environment. © RSNA, 2026

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiology Artificial Intelligence
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.250200
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact on Cost and Expert Time of Data-Efficient Deep Learning for Medical Image Segmentation

L Lotter-Becker, Mirjam Schöneck, Nils Große Hokamp, Thorsten Persigehl et al.
Radiology Artificial Intelligence
AI in cancer detection
article

Impact on Cost and Expert Time of Data-Efficient Deep Learning for Medical Image Segmentation

L Lotter-Becker, Mirjam Schöneck, Nils Große Hokamp, Thorsten Persigehl, Robert Peter Reimer, Simon Lennartz, Markus Bujotzek, Sita Arjune, Alexander Köhn, Stefan Denner, Matthias May, Miriam Rinneburger, Liliana Caldeira, Roman‐Ulrich Müller, Astha Jaiswal, L Stepansky, Philomena A Wawer Matos Reimer, Laura Oberlinkels, Andreas Bucher, Franziska Meyer, Klaus Maier-Hein, Ünal Akünal, Markus Habert
article en

Abstract

Purpose To develop and systematically evaluate an iterative training approach, termed the expert-guided annotation loop, for efficient reference standard medical image segmentation, including assessment of two sample-selection strategies and real-world clinical implementation. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included ten datasets comprising 1948 CT or MRI examinations from autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, prostate cancer, uveal melanoma, thyroid eye disease, and non-small cell lung cancer patients. nnU-Net segmentation models were iteratively trained using an expert-guided annotation loop with random or active learning-based sample selection. In each iteration, additional samples were added to the training set, and model-generated presegmentations were corrected by expert radiologists to create reference standard annotations. Expert time required for manual segmentation versus presegmentations correction was measured. Model performance and efficiency were assessed using nonparametric tests, and cost savings were estimated for kidney and tumor segmentation using probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Feasibility of end-to-end no-code implementation was evaluated. Results Fifty-seven segmentation models were trained and evaluated. Final model Dice scores ranged from 0.67–0.97 for organ segmentation and from 0.64–0.69 for lung tumor segmentation across internal and external test sets. Maximum expert time savings were 90.3% for kidney and 48.2% for tumor segmentation ( P < .001 and P = .003), corresponding to estimated per-examination cost savings of $14.30[95% CI: $5.94, $26.87] and $5.63[95% CI: $-7.26, $26.09], respectively. No-code execution of the expert-guided annotation loop was feasible. Conclusion The expert-guided annotation loop reduced expert annotation time and enabled estimated cost savings while producing high-quality reference standard CT and MRI segmentations. The no-code workflow was implemented in a clinical environment. © RSNA, 2026

Radiology Artificial Intelligence
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), German Cancer Research Center (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), Heidelberg University of Education (DE), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen (DE), National Center for Tumor Diseases (DE), Heidelberg Engineering (Germany) (DE), University Hospital Frankfurt (DE), Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine (DE), Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging Associated Diseases (DE), University Hospital Cologne (DE), Heidelberg University (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.