Moving peace forward: Negotiating freedom of movement in peace processes

Freedom of movement is a critical yet underexplored element of peace processes. During conflict, warring parties often restrict movement through checkpoints, curfews, blockades, or sieges, disrupting civilian life and obstructing humanitarian and peace operations. While peace negotiations frequently address such restrictions, existing literature tends to overlook freedom of movement or treats it as a secondary or technical issue. This article seeks to fill that gap by outlining a new research agenda at the intersection of political geography and conflict management. First, we conceptualise freedom of movement as the ability of people and goods to move unobstructed through physical space. Coding over 10,000 negotiation rounds in inter-state, intra-state, and nonstate conflicts between 1989 and 2023, we then classify negotiation topics according to whether they concern the movement of actors, the movement of goods, or movement to and from specific spaces and highlight the prevalence of negotiations on freedom of movement in peace processes. Building on this, we illustrate how freedom of movement can function both as a negotiated outcome and a means for advancing peace processes and outline several avenues for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Geography
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2026.103609
Primary Topic
Peacebuilding and International Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Moving peace forward: Negotiating freedom of movement in peace processes

Allard Duursma, Valentin Felix Geier, Janek Bruker, Emilian Berutti
Political Geography
Peacebuilding and International Security
article

Moving peace forward: Negotiating freedom of movement in peace processes

Allard Duursma, Valentin Felix Geier, Janek Bruker, Emilian Berutti
article en

Abstract

Freedom of movement is a critical yet underexplored element of peace processes. During conflict, warring parties often restrict movement through checkpoints, curfews, blockades, or sieges, disrupting civilian life and obstructing humanitarian and peace operations. While peace negotiations frequently address such restrictions, existing literature tends to overlook freedom of movement or treats it as a secondary or technical issue. This article seeks to fill that gap by outlining a new research agenda at the intersection of political geography and conflict management. First, we conceptualise freedom of movement as the ability of people and goods to move unobstructed through physical space. Coding over 10,000 negotiation rounds in inter-state, intra-state, and nonstate conflicts between 1989 and 2023, we then classify negotiation topics according to whether they concern the movement of actors, the movement of goods, or movement to and from specific spaces and highlight the prevalence of negotiations on freedom of movement in peace processes. Building on this, we illustrate how freedom of movement can function both as a negotiated outcome and a means for advancing peace processes and outline several avenues for future research.

Political GeographyVol. 130
ETH Zurich (CH), Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies (CH)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Peacebuilding and International Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Moving peace forward: Negotiating freedom of movement in peace processes — Allard Duursma, Valentin Felix Geier, et al. · Political Geography (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS