Anchorage performance of different punching shear reinforcement elements in cracked concrete

Abstract Extensive research has been conducted on the bond and anchorage behavior of reinforcement elements in concrete. While many experimental studies have focused on uncracked concrete, the anchorage performance in the presence of cracks remains insufficiently understood. This gap is particularly critical for punching shear reinforcement, which is installed in highly stressed and cracked regions around point supports in flat slabs. To address this issue, the present study comprises 60 pull‐out tests on five types of commonly used punching shear reinforcement elements including hooks, stirrups, and double‐headed studs tested in both uncracked and cracked concrete. Straight bars were additionally examined as reference elements. The experimental program systematically investigated the influence of crack widths up to 2.0 mm on anchorage capacity, slip behavior, and strain distribution. The results show that concrete cracking has a significant influence on the anchorage performance of all types of punching shear reinforcement elements. Despite a general reduction in anchorage stiffness with increasing crack width, only reinforcement types such as straight bars and hooks showed a notable decrease in anchorage capacity, whereas stirrups and double‐headed studs retained their full load‐bearing capacity in cracked concrete. The paper presents experimental results comprising load‐slip curves as well as fiber optic measurements of strains along the anchorage length and assesses the results with different models from the literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Structural Concrete
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.70690
Primary Topic
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anchorage performance of different punching shear reinforcement elements in cracked concrete

Martin Claßen, Josef Hegger, Jan Ungermann, Niklas Mueller
Structural Concrete
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
article

Anchorage performance of different punching shear reinforcement elements in cracked concrete

Martin Claßen, Josef Hegger, Jan Ungermann, Niklas Mueller
article en

Abstract

Abstract Extensive research has been conducted on the bond and anchorage behavior of reinforcement elements in concrete. While many experimental studies have focused on uncracked concrete, the anchorage performance in the presence of cracks remains insufficiently understood. This gap is particularly critical for punching shear reinforcement, which is installed in highly stressed and cracked regions around point supports in flat slabs. To address this issue, the present study comprises 60 pull‐out tests on five types of commonly used punching shear reinforcement elements including hooks, stirrups, and double‐headed studs tested in both uncracked and cracked concrete. Straight bars were additionally examined as reference elements. The experimental program systematically investigated the influence of crack widths up to 2.0 mm on anchorage capacity, slip behavior, and strain distribution. The results show that concrete cracking has a significant influence on the anchorage performance of all types of punching shear reinforcement elements. Despite a general reduction in anchorage stiffness with increasing crack width, only reinforcement types such as straight bars and hooks showed a notable decrease in anchorage capacity, whereas stirrups and double‐headed studs retained their full load‐bearing capacity in cracked concrete. The paper presents experimental results comprising load‐slip curves as well as fiber optic measurements of strains along the anchorage length and assesses the results with different models from the literature.

Structural Concrete
Ingenieure für das Bauwesen (DE), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.