From body hulls to musculoskeletal models: Personalized inertial parameter estimation

Every human body is different, however, current movement analysis does not reflect that, as it heavily relies on generic musculoskeletal models. Usually, these models are scaled to match the participants' body segment lengths and body weight, but not taking individual body shape into account. This can lead to errors in the estimation of joint forces and torques, which are important to accurately estimate musculoskeletal variables. Thus, we developed a method to estimate body segment inertial parameters based on body hulls acquired via smartphone pictures. From the body hull, we infer the skeletal shape and pose, and then estimate the distribution of bone, lean, and fatty tissues. We then segment the body hull and assign each tissue type a density, which is used to calculate the body segment inertial parameters. To allow for the use of our method with existing data, we also introduce two new generic musculoskeletal models, which are based on the average standing body shapes. Validation using MRI-derived ground-truth models shows that our method creates participant-specific musculoskeletal models that are closer to the MRI-derived ground truth than scaled generic models. Additionally, we performed lab-based gait experiments to evaluate the effect of our method on residual forces and joint moments, where we found that our method leads to a reduction of residual forces of up to 14.9% and a reduction of metabolic cost of up to 12.8% when compared to generic musculoskeletal models. Our new generic models show similar joint moment outcomes, but less reduction of residual forces than the personalized models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0349886
Primary Topic
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From body hulls to musculoskeletal models: Personalized inertial parameter estimation

Anne D. Koelewijn, Matthias Braun, Timo Menzel, Mario Botsch et al.
PLoS ONE
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
article

From body hulls to musculoskeletal models: Personalized inertial parameter estimation

Anne D. Koelewijn, Matthias Braun, Timo Menzel, Mario Botsch, Eva Maria Hille, Jörg Miehling, I. S. Wechsler, Markus Gambietz, Tabea Ott, Philipp Amon, Putri Qistina Azam, Katie L. McMahon
article en

Abstract

Every human body is different, however, current movement analysis does not reflect that, as it heavily relies on generic musculoskeletal models. Usually, these models are scaled to match the participants' body segment lengths and body weight, but not taking individual body shape into account. This can lead to errors in the estimation of joint forces and torques, which are important to accurately estimate musculoskeletal variables. Thus, we developed a method to estimate body segment inertial parameters based on body hulls acquired via smartphone pictures. From the body hull, we infer the skeletal shape and pose, and then estimate the distribution of bone, lean, and fatty tissues. We then segment the body hull and assign each tissue type a density, which is used to calculate the body segment inertial parameters. To allow for the use of our method with existing data, we also introduce two new generic musculoskeletal models, which are based on the average standing body shapes. Validation using MRI-derived ground-truth models shows that our method creates participant-specific musculoskeletal models that are closer to the MRI-derived ground truth than scaled generic models. Additionally, we performed lab-based gait experiments to evaluate the effect of our method on residual forces and joint moments, where we found that our method leads to a reduction of residual forces of up to 14.9% and a reduction of metabolic cost of up to 12.8% when compared to generic musculoskeletal models. Our new generic models show similar joint moment outcomes, but less reduction of residual forces than the personalized models.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(6)
University of Vienna (AT), Queensland University of Technology (AU), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), TU Dortmund University (DE), Institute of Science and Ethics (DE), Technical University of Denmark (DK)
International Society of Biomechanics, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.