Selection bias and inferential validity in fever of unknown origin studies. Comment on: Poposki et al. Visceral leishmaniasis as a leading cause of fever of unknown origin in immunocompetent adults

The article by Poposki et al. on visceral leishmaniasis as a cause of fever of unknown origin presents clinically valuable observations but exhibits substantial methodological limitations. Differential exclusion of undiagnosed cases introduces selection bias and precludes generalizable prevalence estimates. The analytical strategy lacks etiological coherence by comparing a specific diagnosis against heterogeneous conditions. Multiple univariate comparisons without adjustment for family-wise error rate and absence of multivariable analysis to control confounding limit causal inference. The cross-sectional assessment of clinical features after diagnostic confirmation precludes temporal inference. Future studies would benefit from nested case-control designs, transparent reporting of diagnostic pathways, and appropriate statistical adjustment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Folia Medica
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3897/folmed.68.e184403
Primary Topic
Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Selection bias and inferential validity in fever of unknown origin studies. Comment on: Poposki et al. Visceral leishmaniasis as a leading cause of fever of unknown origin in immunocompetent adults

Kostadin Kostadinov
Folia Medica
Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
article

Selection bias and inferential validity in fever of unknown origin studies. Comment on: Poposki et al. Visceral leishmaniasis as a leading cause of fever of unknown origin in immunocompetent adults

Kostadin Kostadinov
article en

Abstract

The article by Poposki et al. on visceral leishmaniasis as a cause of fever of unknown origin presents clinically valuable observations but exhibits substantial methodological limitations. Differential exclusion of undiagnosed cases introduces selection bias and precludes generalizable prevalence estimates. The analytical strategy lacks etiological coherence by comparing a specific diagnosis against heterogeneous conditions. Multiple univariate comparisons without adjustment for family-wise error rate and absence of multivariable analysis to control confounding limit causal inference. The cross-sectional assessment of clinical features after diagnostic confirmation precludes temporal inference. Future studies would benefit from nested case-control designs, transparent reporting of diagnostic pathways, and appropriate statistical adjustment.

Folia MedicaVol. 68(3)
Medical University Plovdiv (BG)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.