Promise and challenges of heart chamber segmentation from noncontrast CT scans using contrastive unpaired image translation: a feasibility study

PurposeTo evaluate the feasibility and challenges of heart chamber segmentation from noncontrast CT scans using contrastive unpaired image translation and deep learning-based segmentation.ApproachWe developed ChameleonNet, a framework utilizing the Contrastive Unpaired Translation (CUT) network with decoupled contrastive learning (DCL) loss to synthesize noncontrast CT from contrast CT scans. Using annotations of four heart chambers (left atrium (LA), left ventricle (LV), right atrium (RA), and right ventricle (RV)) from contrast scans, we trained a Hausdorff distance loss-enhanced nnU-Net on synthesized noncontrast images. The translation model was trained with 35,538 contrast-enhanced and 37,197 noncontrast CT slices. The segmentation model was trained with 292 synthesized noncontrast scans. Performance was evaluated using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95th Hausdorff distance (HD95) on 36 synthesized noncontrast scans, and volume agreement on 36 real noncontrast CT scans was assessed using Pearson correlation, mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and mean percentage error (MPE).ResultsThe segmentation model achieved DSC of 0.94 (±0.01), 0.91 (±0.04), 0.92 (±0.03), 0.93 (±0.02), and HD95 of 3.63 (±1.49), 5.74 (±4.08), 5.18 (±1.77), and 5.51 (±3.21) mm on synthesized noncontrast images for LA, LV, RA, and RV, respectively. On real noncontrast CT scans, Pearson correlations were 0.93, 0.82, 0.87, and 0.89 (all p<0.001), with MAPE ranging from 9.22% to 20.79%, and MPE ranging from −12.52% to 4.67%.ConclusionsChameleonNet demonstrated feasibility for heart chamber segmentation from noncontrast CT without manual noncontrast annotations. However, volume errors, particularly for LV and RV, indicate that further refinement and validation are needed before clinical use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of medical imaging
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1117/1.jmi.13.5.054004
Primary Topic
Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Promise and challenges of heart chamber segmentation from noncontrast CT scans using contrastive unpaired image translation: a feasibility study

Jiantao Pu, Zixue Zeng, Hao-En Lu, Jing Wang et al.
2 links
Journal of medical imaging
Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
article

Promise and challenges of heart chamber segmentation from noncontrast CT scans using contrastive unpaired image translation: a feasibility study

Jiantao Pu, Zixue Zeng, Hao-En Lu, Jing Wang, Tong Yu, Xin Meng
article en

Abstract

PurposeTo evaluate the feasibility and challenges of heart chamber segmentation from noncontrast CT scans using contrastive unpaired image translation and deep learning-based segmentation.ApproachWe developed ChameleonNet, a framework utilizing the Contrastive Unpaired Translation (CUT) network with decoupled contrastive learning (DCL) loss to synthesize noncontrast CT from contrast CT scans. Using annotations of four heart chambers (left atrium (LA), left ventricle (LV), right atrium (RA), and right ventricle (RV)) from contrast scans, we trained a Hausdorff distance loss-enhanced nnU-Net on synthesized noncontrast images. The translation model was trained with 35,538 contrast-enhanced and 37,197 noncontrast CT slices. The segmentation model was trained with 292 synthesized noncontrast scans. Performance was evaluated using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95th Hausdorff distance (HD95) on 36 synthesized noncontrast scans, and volume agreement on 36 real noncontrast CT scans was assessed using Pearson correlation, mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and mean percentage error (MPE).ResultsThe segmentation model achieved DSC of 0.94 (±0.01), 0.91 (±0.04), 0.92 (±0.03), 0.93 (±0.02), and HD95 of 3.63 (±1.49), 5.74 (±4.08), 5.18 (±1.77), and 5.51 (±3.21) mm on synthesized noncontrast images for LA, LV, RA, and RV, respectively. On real noncontrast CT scans, Pearson correlations were 0.93, 0.82, 0.87, and 0.89 (all p<0.001), with MAPE ranging from 9.22% to 20.79%, and MPE ranging from −12.52% to 4.67%.ConclusionsChameleonNet demonstrated feasibility for heart chamber segmentation from noncontrast CT without manual noncontrast annotations. However, volume errors, particularly for LV and RV, indicate that further refinement and validation are needed before clinical use.

Journal of medical imagingVol. 13(05)
University of Pittsburgh (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon