The Moral Status of Nature: Characterisation of the Orientations of Biocentric and Anthropocentric Beliefs / <i>El estatus moral de la naturaleza: caracterización de las orientaciones de creencias biocéntricas y antropocéntricas</i>

The goal of this research is to study the psychosocial differences between two profiles of environmental ethics, namely biocentrism and anthropocentrism, which entail greater and lesser moral inclusivity, respectively. It studies their correlates and both orientations’ relationship with a behavioural commitment to social and environmental causes. Regarding methodology, an online questionnaire was used with a sample of 353 participants. Descriptive, correlative, regression and mediation analyses were performed to check the hypotheses. The results indicate that biocentrism and anthropocentrism are two distinct orientations of beliefs about the moral status of living beings. Biocentric beliefs play an important role in involvement in social participation actions for causes both human and nature-related, while anthropocentric beliefs do not have this capacity for mobilisation. Finally, given that the results provide new evidence, possible theoretical and practical implications and future avenues of research are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PsyEcology Bilingual Journal of Environmental Psychology
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21711976261454563
Primary Topic
Environmental Education and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Moral Status of Nature: Characterisation of the Orientations of Biocentric and Anthropocentric Beliefs / El estatus moral de la naturaleza: caracterización de las orientaciones de creencias biocéntricas y antropocéntricas

Anna Zlobina, Irene María Arribas-Tiemblo
PsyEcology Bilingual Journal of Environmental Psychology
Environmental Education and Sustainability
article

The Moral Status of Nature: Characterisation of the Orientations of Biocentric and Anthropocentric Beliefs / El estatus moral de la naturaleza: caracterización de las orientaciones de creencias biocéntricas y antropocéntricas

Anna Zlobina, Irene María Arribas-Tiemblo
article en

Abstract

The goal of this research is to study the psychosocial differences between two profiles of environmental ethics, namely biocentrism and anthropocentrism, which entail greater and lesser moral inclusivity, respectively. It studies their correlates and both orientations’ relationship with a behavioural commitment to social and environmental causes. Regarding methodology, an online questionnaire was used with a sample of 353 participants. Descriptive, correlative, regression and mediation analyses were performed to check the hypotheses. The results indicate that biocentrism and anthropocentrism are two distinct orientations of beliefs about the moral status of living beings. Biocentric beliefs play an important role in involvement in social participation actions for causes both human and nature-related, while anthropocentric beliefs do not have this capacity for mobilisation. Finally, given that the results provide new evidence, possible theoretical and practical implications and future avenues of research are discussed.

PsyEcology Bilingual Journal of Environmental Psychology
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Environmental Education and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.