Populism and emotional campaigning: the strategic use of emotions in the 2021 Czech general election campaign

This study examines the role of emotions in online political communication during the 2021 Czech general election campaign. We focus on differences between populist and non-populist parties and their different roles – as government or opposition actors. Using quantitative content analysis, we analysed 2,644 Facebook posts published by parliamentary political parties and their leaders one month before the election, focusing on the strategic use of different emotions and blame attribution in their communication. While existing research characterizes populist communication as highly emotional, our findings partly challenge this assumption. The results suggest that populist parties in government tend to moderate their rhetoric, particularly their use of negative emotions, such as fear and anger. The findings also indicate that opposition parties were more likely to use negative emotional appeal and blame attribution, whereas government actors relied more on enthusiasm and positive rhetoric. Our study contributes to the discussion on the strategic adaptation of populist parties’ communication when they assume a governmental position.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Contemporary European Studies
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2026.2694033
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Populism and emotional campaigning: the strategic use of emotions in the 2021 Czech general election campaign

Vlastimil Havlík, Sára Cigánková
Journal of Contemporary European Studies
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
article

Populism and emotional campaigning: the strategic use of emotions in the 2021 Czech general election campaign

Vlastimil Havlík, Sára Cigánková
article en

Abstract

This study examines the role of emotions in online political communication during the 2021 Czech general election campaign. We focus on differences between populist and non-populist parties and their different roles – as government or opposition actors. Using quantitative content analysis, we analysed 2,644 Facebook posts published by parliamentary political parties and their leaders one month before the election, focusing on the strategic use of different emotions and blame attribution in their communication. While existing research characterizes populist communication as highly emotional, our findings partly challenge this assumption. The results suggest that populist parties in government tend to moderate their rhetoric, particularly their use of negative emotions, such as fear and anger. The findings also indicate that opposition parties were more likely to use negative emotional appeal and blame attribution, whereas government actors relied more on enthusiasm and positive rhetoric. Our study contributes to the discussion on the strategic adaptation of populist parties’ communication when they assume a governmental position.

Journal of Contemporary European Studies
Masaryk University (CZ)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.