Carceral hegemony: Confinement, race and state formation in Italy

From the emergency laws used to suppress resistance in Southern Italy during the country's unification in the mid-nineteenth century to the detention centres in Libya that Italy funds today, confinement has served as a persistent instrument of governance. Yet how carceral institutions produce the very categories that justify their own expansion remains among the least theorised feature. This article introduces the concept of carceral hegemony and its operative mechanism, constitutive power: the capacity of legal technologies, spatial strategies, and epistemic practices to produce the categories of the dangerous, the deviant, and the excludable that carceral governance then claims merely to manage. Drawing on four historical phases of Italian state formation, the article demonstrates that the populations to which carceral power claims to respond are not pre-given facts about the social world but are produced through governance itself. This has a direct implication for reform: interventions that accept those categories as given risk reproducing the very logic they seek to challenge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theoretical Criminology
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13624806261458762
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carceral hegemony: Confinement, race and state formation in Italy

Simone Santorso
Theoretical Criminology
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Carceral hegemony: Confinement, race and state formation in Italy

Simone Santorso
article en

Abstract

From the emergency laws used to suppress resistance in Southern Italy during the country's unification in the mid-nineteenth century to the detention centres in Libya that Italy funds today, confinement has served as a persistent instrument of governance. Yet how carceral institutions produce the very categories that justify their own expansion remains among the least theorised feature. This article introduces the concept of carceral hegemony and its operative mechanism, constitutive power: the capacity of legal technologies, spatial strategies, and epistemic practices to produce the categories of the dangerous, the deviant, and the excludable that carceral governance then claims merely to manage. Drawing on four historical phases of Italian state formation, the article demonstrates that the populations to which carceral power claims to respond are not pre-given facts about the social world but are produced through governance itself. This has a direct implication for reform: interventions that accept those categories as given risk reproducing the very logic they seek to challenge.

Theoretical Criminology
University of Sussex (GB)
Gender equality, Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Carceral hegemony: Confinement, race and state formation in Italy — Simone Santorso · Theoretical Criminology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS