Toward resilient energy assets: comparative evaluation of additive manufacturing technologies for critical spare parts

Purpose Ensuring continued operation of industrial assets increasingly depends on replacing legacy components whose original tooling, suppliers and manufacturing routes are no longer available. Additive manufacturing (AM) offers a route to restore supply of such critical parts, but practical guidance on process selection and validation is limited. This study aims to establish and validate an end-to-end workflow for qualifying AM routes for legacy metal components in the energy sector, using an eccentric chemical pump gear as a representative case study. Design/methodology/approach A cast iron gear was reverse engineered using high-resolution 3D scanning and the geometry was refined through generative design to improve printability and reduce material usage. The part was reproduced using CoCr alloy by Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) and 4140 chromoly steel by sinter-based Bound Metal Deposition (BMD). Finite element analysis and LPBF process simulation were used to verify load-bearing performance and screen build orientations. Printed parts were postprocessed, inspected for dimensional accuracy, mechanically characterized and validated using API 677 gear contact testing and in-field operation. Findings Both AM routes achieved dimensional compliance and acceptable gear contact patterns, while exhibiting distinct trade-offs in mechanical response, accuracy, material consumption and workflow complexity. Successful in-field operation of the AM gear confirmed that the design-simulation-manufacture-test workflow can deliver functionally equivalent replacement parts and reduce dependence on obsolete casting routes. Originality/value A comparative, field-validated assessment is provided of LPBF and BMD for legacy component replacement in the energy sector. The study links reverse engineering, generative design, process simulation and experimental validation into an evidence-based process-selection template for qualifying AM routes for critical spare parts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rapid Prototyping Journal
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/rpj-12-2025-0648
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward resilient energy assets: comparative evaluation of additive manufacturing technologies for critical spare parts

Yasser Al Hamidi, Marwan Khraisheh, Fatima Ghassan Alabtah, Abdalla Mohammed et al.
Rapid Prototyping Journal
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
article

Toward resilient energy assets: comparative evaluation of additive manufacturing technologies for critical spare parts

Yasser Al Hamidi, Marwan Khraisheh, Fatima Ghassan Alabtah, Abdalla Mohammed, Numan Khan, Mohammad Albakri, Manel Chihi
article en

Abstract

Purpose Ensuring continued operation of industrial assets increasingly depends on replacing legacy components whose original tooling, suppliers and manufacturing routes are no longer available. Additive manufacturing (AM) offers a route to restore supply of such critical parts, but practical guidance on process selection and validation is limited. This study aims to establish and validate an end-to-end workflow for qualifying AM routes for legacy metal components in the energy sector, using an eccentric chemical pump gear as a representative case study. Design/methodology/approach A cast iron gear was reverse engineered using high-resolution 3D scanning and the geometry was refined through generative design to improve printability and reduce material usage. The part was reproduced using CoCr alloy by Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) and 4140 chromoly steel by sinter-based Bound Metal Deposition (BMD). Finite element analysis and LPBF process simulation were used to verify load-bearing performance and screen build orientations. Printed parts were postprocessed, inspected for dimensional accuracy, mechanically characterized and validated using API 677 gear contact testing and in-field operation. Findings Both AM routes achieved dimensional compliance and acceptable gear contact patterns, while exhibiting distinct trade-offs in mechanical response, accuracy, material consumption and workflow complexity. Successful in-field operation of the AM gear confirmed that the design-simulation-manufacture-test workflow can deliver functionally equivalent replacement parts and reduce dependence on obsolete casting routes. Originality/value A comparative, field-validated assessment is provided of LPBF and BMD for legacy component replacement in the energy sector. The study links reverse engineering, generative design, process simulation and experimental validation into an evidence-based process-selection template for qualifying AM routes for critical spare parts.

Rapid Prototyping JournalVol. 32(11)
Hamad bin Khalifa University (QA)
Qatar National Research Fund
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.