Middle Powers and Sports Mega-Events in an Era of World Order Ferment: The Case of South Korea

Since the early 1990s South Korea has come to be widely perceived, internally and externally, as a global ‘middle power’. But what does this mean concerning its approach to international relations? How, more particularly, is it reflected in its approach to hosting Sports Mega-Events (SMEs)? In this paper it is argued that the most persuasive explanation for distinguishing a category of middle powers in international politics is their distinctive role in processes of (re-) constituting ‘world orders’. And in this context, their prominent involvement in SME hosting makes a significant contribution both to the legitimation of SME ‘brands’, and to the role of SME’s in reinforcing the rise and decline of particular world orders. Situating Korea’s eager pursuit of SME hosting opportunities in comparison to middle powers as a group, the paper distinguishes hostcentred objectives and impacts from the systemic repercussions of middle powers’ SME hosting roles, with particular attention to their role in the rise, sustainment, and decline of hegemonic neoliberalism between the early 1980s and the mid 2020s. Finally, the challenges they face in navigating the new politics of SMEs in an era of world order uncertainty are addressed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Sport History & Culture
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/27690148.2026.2626034
Primary Topic
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Middle Powers and Sports Mega-Events in an Era of World Order Ferment: The Case of South Korea

David Black
Asian Journal of Sport History & Culture
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
article

Middle Powers and Sports Mega-Events in an Era of World Order Ferment: The Case of South Korea

David Black
article en

Abstract

Since the early 1990s South Korea has come to be widely perceived, internally and externally, as a global ‘middle power’. But what does this mean concerning its approach to international relations? How, more particularly, is it reflected in its approach to hosting Sports Mega-Events (SMEs)? In this paper it is argued that the most persuasive explanation for distinguishing a category of middle powers in international politics is their distinctive role in processes of (re-) constituting ‘world orders’. And in this context, their prominent involvement in SME hosting makes a significant contribution both to the legitimation of SME ‘brands’, and to the role of SME’s in reinforcing the rise and decline of particular world orders. Situating Korea’s eager pursuit of SME hosting opportunities in comparison to middle powers as a group, the paper distinguishes hostcentred objectives and impacts from the systemic repercussions of middle powers’ SME hosting roles, with particular attention to their role in the rise, sustainment, and decline of hegemonic neoliberalism between the early 1980s and the mid 2020s. Finally, the challenges they face in navigating the new politics of SMEs in an era of world order uncertainty are addressed.

Asian Journal of Sport History & Culture
Dalhousie University (CA)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.