When Accounting Qualities Collide: Accruals Quality, Comparability and Information Risk in <scp>SEO</scp> Underpricing

ABSTRACT We examine how accounting quality attributes jointly mitigate underpricing associated with two dimensions of information risk in seasoned equity offerings (SEOs). In information environments with relatively more potent information asymmetry, the evidence suggests that accruals quality and accounting comparability act as substitutes; i.e., accounting comparability mitigates underpricing associated with lower quality accruals. In relatively less asymmetry‐potent settings, the evidence suggests a complementary interactive effect, whereby higher quality accruals potentiate the effectiveness of comparability in mitigating uncertainty‐driven underpricing. The paper informs standard‐setter conceptualizations of accounting attributes and advances research on the role of accounting quality in mitigating information risk‐related market frictions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Accounting and Finance
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.70248
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When Accounting Qualities Collide: Accruals Quality, Comparability and Information Risk in SEO Underpricing

Suning Zhang, Adam Bordeman, Philip B. Shane, David B. Smith
Accounting and Finance
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

When Accounting Qualities Collide: Accruals Quality, Comparability and Information Risk in SEO Underpricing

Suning Zhang, Adam Bordeman, Philip B. Shane, David B. Smith
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT We examine how accounting quality attributes jointly mitigate underpricing associated with two dimensions of information risk in seasoned equity offerings (SEOs). In information environments with relatively more potent information asymmetry, the evidence suggests that accruals quality and accounting comparability act as substitutes; i.e., accounting comparability mitigates underpricing associated with lower quality accruals. In relatively less asymmetry‐potent settings, the evidence suggests a complementary interactive effect, whereby higher quality accruals potentiate the effectiveness of comparability in mitigating uncertainty‐driven underpricing. The paper informs standard‐setter conceptualizations of accounting attributes and advances research on the role of accounting quality in mitigating information risk‐related market frictions.

Accounting and Finance
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US), California Polytechnic State University (US), William & Mary (US), Iowa State University (US), University of Nebraska System (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.