Structuring ethics for large language models in knowledge organization – philosophical foundations, norms and practical imperatives

Purpose This paper aims to develop a multi-level ethical framework for the integration of large language models (LLMs) into knowledge organization (KO) and knowledge organization systems (KOS). It addresses the ontological shift from human-curated semantic artefacts to probabilistic generated texts and the resulting ethical implications for knowledge infrastructures. Design/methodology/approach The study employs a conceptual analysis rooted in the philosophy of information and semiotics. It examines the mediation of meaning through statistical correlation versus semantic understanding to identify unique ethical risks in KOS. Findings The analysis reveals that LLMs transform the status of organized knowledge, threatening epistemic diversity and semantic authority. The paper proposes a three-level framework comprising a meta-ethical level, a high-end principles level and a guidelines level to govern LLM deployment in KO and KOS. Originality/value While general artificial intelligence ethics frameworks exist, this research provides a specialized structure for the KO community. It bridges the gap between high-level philosophical reasoning and practical implementation, specifically addressing the semiotic integrity of knowledge systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Documentation
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jd-04-2026-0185
Primary Topic
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structuring ethics for large language models in knowledge organization – philosophical foundations, norms and practical imperatives

Bent Sørensen, Amalia Nurma Dewi, Martin Thellefsen
Journal of Documentation
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
article

Structuring ethics for large language models in knowledge organization – philosophical foundations, norms and practical imperatives

Bent Sørensen, Amalia Nurma Dewi, Martin Thellefsen
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to develop a multi-level ethical framework for the integration of large language models (LLMs) into knowledge organization (KO) and knowledge organization systems (KOS). It addresses the ontological shift from human-curated semantic artefacts to probabilistic generated texts and the resulting ethical implications for knowledge infrastructures. Design/methodology/approach The study employs a conceptual analysis rooted in the philosophy of information and semiotics. It examines the mediation of meaning through statistical correlation versus semantic understanding to identify unique ethical risks in KOS. Findings The analysis reveals that LLMs transform the status of organized knowledge, threatening epistemic diversity and semantic authority. The paper proposes a three-level framework comprising a meta-ethical level, a high-end principles level and a guidelines level to govern LLM deployment in KO and KOS. Originality/value While general artificial intelligence ethics frameworks exist, this research provides a specialized structure for the KO community. It bridges the gap between high-level philosophical reasoning and practical implementation, specifically addressing the semiotic integrity of knowledge systems.

Journal of Documentation
State University of Malang (ID), University of Copenhagen (DK), University College Copenhagen (DK), Film Independent (US), IT University of Copenhagen (DK)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.