Atomic sameness: Static placemaking and nuclear dynamism

Dozens of locations across the United States were impacted by the development and deployment of American atomic weapons. Some of these places continue to change along with the world around them. Other sites remain in intentionally static space. Using a cultural landscape approach, this paper analyzes two such places that represent two broad groups of static atomic landscapes: 1) atomic testing sites; and 2) remnant sites for containment of stored materials and byproducts from the processing and extraction for and scientific testing of atomic technology. Influencing the static nature of such landscapes is a combination of intentional government-led efforts to monitor and keep such sites unchanged (to prevent potential contamination in the surrounding communities) and the remoteness, inaccessibility, and sometimes hidden nature of such locations. But another outcome is the creation of several largely stable, unchanging, distinct, and meaningful landscapes that reveal some of the less-known messages from the atomic age. Thus, even static spaces can be a dynamic force for placemaking for those who interact with the sites.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Geographical Review
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00167428.2026.2669533
Primary Topic
Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Atomic sameness: Static placemaking and nuclear dynamism

Rex J. Rowley
Geographical Review
Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
article

Atomic sameness: Static placemaking and nuclear dynamism

Rex J. Rowley
article en

Abstract

Dozens of locations across the United States were impacted by the development and deployment of American atomic weapons. Some of these places continue to change along with the world around them. Other sites remain in intentionally static space. Using a cultural landscape approach, this paper analyzes two such places that represent two broad groups of static atomic landscapes: 1) atomic testing sites; and 2) remnant sites for containment of stored materials and byproducts from the processing and extraction for and scientific testing of atomic technology. Influencing the static nature of such landscapes is a combination of intentional government-led efforts to monitor and keep such sites unchanged (to prevent potential contamination in the surrounding communities) and the remoteness, inaccessibility, and sometimes hidden nature of such locations. But another outcome is the creation of several largely stable, unchanging, distinct, and meaningful landscapes that reveal some of the less-known messages from the atomic age. Thus, even static spaces can be a dynamic force for placemaking for those who interact with the sites.

Geographical Review
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.