Clinical Research Article Surgical Reconstruction of the Proximal Tibia in Primary Bone Tumors in Children and Adolescent Patients: A 30-Year Retrospective Study of Osteoarticular and Resurfaced Allografts

BACKGROUND: The proximal tibia is a common site for primary bone tumors in children and presents unique reconstructive challenges. Despite surgical advances, optimal strategies remain controversial, and complication rates are high. While several studies have compared reconstruction methods, few have specifically described the long-term evolution of biological reconstruction strategies for pediatric proximal tibial tumors. The main purpose of this study was to illustrate the development of biological reconstruction techniques for proximal tibial tumors in children and assess associated complications and allograft survival. METHODS: This retrospective study included 60 pediatric patients who underwent proximal tibial reconstruction with either osteoarticular (OA) or resurfaced osteoarticular (ROA) allografts between 1990 and 2021. OA procedures (n=14) represents the early phase of our experience, with surgeries performed between 1990 and 2000, whereas ROA procedures (n=46) reflect subsequent refinements, and were performed from 1996; differences in sample size, treatment period, and technique are inherent to the study's descriptive, observational design. Clinical outcomes, complication profiles, and allograft survival were analyzed with a minimum 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were comparable across groups. The use of ROA increased significantly over time ( P <0.001). Postoperative complications occurred in 34 patients (57%), with allograft fracture (44%) and pseudoarthrosis (32%) being the most frequent. Complication rates were associated with reconstruction type ( P =0.031). Allograft failure occurred in 82% of complicated cases. Allograft survival was 56% at 5 years and 48% at 10 years. ROA showed higher, though not statistically significant, survival compared with OA (58% vs. 19%, P =0.236). At final follow-up, 67% of patients were alive and disease-free. CONCLUSION: Biological reconstruction of pediatric proximal tibial tumors remains complex but offers acceptable long-term outcomes. This series illustrates a progressive e transition from OA to ROA techniques, associated with favorable allograft survival and reduced fracture rates. Despite high complication rates, many failures were managed without compromising future reconstructive options. Infection remains a critical concern, emphasizing the importance of surgical precision. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II-prognostic study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/bpo.0000000000003385
Primary Topic
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Research Article Surgical Reconstruction of the Proximal Tibia in Primary Bone Tumors in Children and Adolescent Patients: A 30-Year Retrospective Study of Osteoarticular and Resurfaced Allografts

F Giovannelli, Roberta Laranga, L Campanacci, Mark Spitoni et al.
Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Clinical Research Article Surgical Reconstruction of the Proximal Tibia in Primary Bone Tumors in Children and Adolescent Patients: A 30-Year Retrospective Study of Osteoarticular and Resurfaced Allografts

F Giovannelli, Roberta Laranga, L Campanacci, Mark Spitoni, Marco Manfrini, Davide M. Donati, Giuseppe Bianchi, Nicola Seoni, Ostetto Federico
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The proximal tibia is a common site for primary bone tumors in children and presents unique reconstructive challenges. Despite surgical advances, optimal strategies remain controversial, and complication rates are high. While several studies have compared reconstruction methods, few have specifically described the long-term evolution of biological reconstruction strategies for pediatric proximal tibial tumors. The main purpose of this study was to illustrate the development of biological reconstruction techniques for proximal tibial tumors in children and assess associated complications and allograft survival. METHODS: This retrospective study included 60 pediatric patients who underwent proximal tibial reconstruction with either osteoarticular (OA) or resurfaced osteoarticular (ROA) allografts between 1990 and 2021. OA procedures (n=14) represents the early phase of our experience, with surgeries performed between 1990 and 2000, whereas ROA procedures (n=46) reflect subsequent refinements, and were performed from 1996; differences in sample size, treatment period, and technique are inherent to the study's descriptive, observational design. Clinical outcomes, complication profiles, and allograft survival were analyzed with a minimum 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were comparable across groups. The use of ROA increased significantly over time ( P <0.001). Postoperative complications occurred in 34 patients (57%), with allograft fracture (44%) and pseudoarthrosis (32%) being the most frequent. Complication rates were associated with reconstruction type ( P =0.031). Allograft failure occurred in 82% of complicated cases. Allograft survival was 56% at 5 years and 48% at 10 years. ROA showed higher, though not statistically significant, survival compared with OA (58% vs. 19%, P =0.236). At final follow-up, 67% of patients were alive and disease-free. CONCLUSION: Biological reconstruction of pediatric proximal tibial tumors remains complex but offers acceptable long-term outcomes. This series illustrates a progressive e transition from OA to ROA techniques, associated with favorable allograft survival and reduced fracture rates. Despite high complication rates, many failures were managed without compromising future reconstructive options. Infection remains a critical concern, emphasizing the importance of surgical precision. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II-prognostic study.

Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics
University of Padua (IT), Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.