From swing producer to swing state: Saudi hedging strategy and the pursuit of strategic autonomy in a multipolar era

This study analyses Saudi Arabia’s evolving foreign policy amid intensifying US–China competition and growing systemic uncertainty. Historically, Saudi Arabia’s influence derived from its role in stabilising global oil markets and its close alignment with the United States. Today, however, the energy transition, the US shale revolution and intensifying US–China rivalry have collectively reshaped the strategic landscape, creating new pressures and opportunities for Riyadh. The study argues that Saudi Arabia’s contemporary strategy is best understood as institutionalised strategic hedging: retaining core security ties with the United States while expanding economic, technological and selective security cooperation with China and other emerging partners. Drawing on hedging theory and middle-power literatures, the study highlights the interaction between external structural pressures and domestic regime-survival imperatives under Vision 2030. It demonstrates that external diversification is not a temporary adjustment but a politically consequential strategy designed to secure economic transformation, reduce vulnerability and preserve strategic autonomy. More broadly, the Saudi case illustrates how resource-rich middle powers can leverage competitive interdependence to institutionalise hedging as a durable foreign policy orientation in an increasingly fragmented global order.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Third World Quarterly
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2026.2683208
Primary Topic
Socioeconomic Development in MENA
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From swing producer to swing state: Saudi hedging strategy and the pursuit of strategic autonomy in a multipolar era

So Yeon Ahn
Third World Quarterly
Socioeconomic Development in MENA
article

From swing producer to swing state: Saudi hedging strategy and the pursuit of strategic autonomy in a multipolar era

So Yeon Ahn
article en

Abstract

This study analyses Saudi Arabia’s evolving foreign policy amid intensifying US–China competition and growing systemic uncertainty. Historically, Saudi Arabia’s influence derived from its role in stabilising global oil markets and its close alignment with the United States. Today, however, the energy transition, the US shale revolution and intensifying US–China rivalry have collectively reshaped the strategic landscape, creating new pressures and opportunities for Riyadh. The study argues that Saudi Arabia’s contemporary strategy is best understood as institutionalised strategic hedging: retaining core security ties with the United States while expanding economic, technological and selective security cooperation with China and other emerging partners. Drawing on hedging theory and middle-power literatures, the study highlights the interaction between external structural pressures and domestic regime-survival imperatives under Vision 2030. It demonstrates that external diversification is not a temporary adjustment but a politically consequential strategy designed to secure economic transformation, reduce vulnerability and preserve strategic autonomy. More broadly, the Saudi case illustrates how resource-rich middle powers can leverage competitive interdependence to institutionalise hedging as a durable foreign policy orientation in an increasingly fragmented global order.

Third World Quarterly
Seoul National University (KR), Korea National University of Arts (KR), Hankuk University of Foreign Studies (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Socioeconomic Development in MENA
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.