Models of DG‐Carbon Bands in Raman Spectra: Effects of Basis Functions and Initial Values on the Uniqueness and S/N of Fits Obtained for Atmospheric Aerosol Using Automated Methods

ABSTRACT Soot, coal, graphite, and similar black‐carbon materials contain layered sheets of sp 2 ‐bonded carbon in regions larger than about 4 nm. Such materials typically exhibit Raman spectra (RS) with a peak near 1580 cm −1 (G band) and, except in the case of graphene or highly ordered graphite, a peak in the range 1300–1350 cm −1 (D band). Here such materials are termed DG‐carbon (DGC). To better characterize DGC, the RS can be represented by multiple D and G bands. Comparisons between “best‐fit” D and G bands reported by different researchers are often not possible, partly because in many cases, the choices that must be made in selection of background removal procedures and optimization approach are not stated. Also, automated fitting methods are needed for characterizing large numbers of RS of DGC, such as those measured using Raman hyperspectral imagers, including those used in characterizing atmospheric aerosol particles. To help facilitate both quantitative comparisons of results and automated fits to RS data, we provide here a fitting code which uses MINPACK‐1 as called by the LMFIT python package. To illustrate the use of the code and to investigate optimization using different numbers of basis functions, 15 DGC spectra and four non‐DGC spectra were fitted. We found, for ±20 cm −1 variability of initial peak positions, the RS fits with two Lorentzian functions converged to a single optimized fit. However, for five‐band fits, (1) the final fit demonstrated notable sensitivity to the initial values of the functions in 11 of 15 cases and (2) constraints on the peak center locations were required to keep peak center positions within valid ranges in some cases. When the RS were weaker or the luminescence was large, the variability in final fits was greater.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Raman Spectroscopy
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.70175
Primary Topic
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Models of DG‐Carbon Bands in Raman Spectra: Effects of Basis Functions and Initial Values on the Uniqueness and S/N of Fits Obtained for Atmospheric Aerosol Using Automated Methods

Steven Hill, D. Doughty
Journal of Raman Spectroscopy
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
article

Models of DG‐Carbon Bands in Raman Spectra: Effects of Basis Functions and Initial Values on the Uniqueness and S/N of Fits Obtained for Atmospheric Aerosol Using Automated Methods

Steven Hill, D. Doughty
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Soot, coal, graphite, and similar black‐carbon materials contain layered sheets of sp 2 ‐bonded carbon in regions larger than about 4 nm. Such materials typically exhibit Raman spectra (RS) with a peak near 1580 cm −1 (G band) and, except in the case of graphene or highly ordered graphite, a peak in the range 1300–1350 cm −1 (D band). Here such materials are termed DG‐carbon (DGC). To better characterize DGC, the RS can be represented by multiple D and G bands. Comparisons between “best‐fit” D and G bands reported by different researchers are often not possible, partly because in many cases, the choices that must be made in selection of background removal procedures and optimization approach are not stated. Also, automated fitting methods are needed for characterizing large numbers of RS of DGC, such as those measured using Raman hyperspectral imagers, including those used in characterizing atmospheric aerosol particles. To help facilitate both quantitative comparisons of results and automated fits to RS data, we provide here a fitting code which uses MINPACK‐1 as called by the LMFIT python package. To illustrate the use of the code and to investigate optimization using different numbers of basis functions, 15 DGC spectra and four non‐DGC spectra were fitted. We found, for ±20 cm −1 variability of initial peak positions, the RS fits with two Lorentzian functions converged to a single optimized fit. However, for five‐band fits, (1) the final fit demonstrated notable sensitivity to the initial values of the functions in 11 of 15 cases and (2) constraints on the peak center locations were required to keep peak center positions within valid ranges in some cases. When the RS were weaker or the luminescence was large, the variability in final fits was greater.

Journal of Raman Spectroscopy
DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory (US), Adelphi Laboratory Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.