Assessment of Treatment Technologies and Research on Governance Models for Acid Mine Drainage from Closed Coal Mines in Karst Regions

Acid mine drainage (AMD) pollution from closed coal mines in karst regions represents a major environmental challenge in the global mining industry. The complexity of hydrogeological conditions in such regions leads to significant challenges in both predictability and controllability of pollution. Taking the Yudong River Basin in Guizhou Province, Southwest China, as the study area, and based on six years (2017–2023) of systematic remediation practices and monitoring data, this study systematically evaluates the effectiveness and applicable conditions of three types of treatment technologies: centralized treatment stations, source control combined with end-of-pipe treatment, and water-sealing ecological plugging. On this basis, governance models applicable to karst regions are distilled. The results show that after six years of remediation, the number of pollution points in the Yudong River Basin decreased from 27 to 12. At the outflow section, the total Fe reduction rate reached 88.3%, the total Mn reduction rate reached 62.3%, and the proportion of contaminated river length was reduced by 78.5%. Each of the three technologies has its own applicable conditions. Centralized treatment stations, characterized by mature technology but high operational costs, are suitable for emergency transition periods. Source control combined with end-of-pipe treatment addresses both symptoms and root causes, making it applicable to complex pollution points. Water-sealing ecological plugging, although cost-controllable, carries a risk of secondary pollution in karst-developed areas. The failure of water-sealing ecological plugging technology is mainly attributed to two mechanisms: bypass flow through karst conduits and overflow induced by water level rise. Based on the six-year remediation practice, this study proposes a source control model for karst conduits centered on the core concepts of “filling, isolating, plugging, intercepting, draining, and controlling”. The implementation process consists of four stages: detailed investigation, graded optimization, stepwise implementation, and long-term monitoring. The core innovation lies in the cross-disciplinary application of coal mine water control techniques to environmental remediation, achieving a shift from passive end-of-pipe treatment to active source control. This model can provide theoretical reference and practical guidance for karst mining areas in Southwest China and other regions with similar geological conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/w18131546
Primary Topic
Mine drainage and remediation techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Treatment Technologies and Research on Governance Models for Acid Mine Drainage from Closed Coal Mines in Karst Regions

Chong Li, 白波, Bin Yang, Xiaoying Zhao et al.
Water
Mine drainage and remediation techniques
article

Assessment of Treatment Technologies and Research on Governance Models for Acid Mine Drainage from Closed Coal Mines in Karst Regions

Chong Li, 白波, Bin Yang, Xiaoying Zhao, Yanan Jiao
article en

Abstract

Acid mine drainage (AMD) pollution from closed coal mines in karst regions represents a major environmental challenge in the global mining industry. The complexity of hydrogeological conditions in such regions leads to significant challenges in both predictability and controllability of pollution. Taking the Yudong River Basin in Guizhou Province, Southwest China, as the study area, and based on six years (2017–2023) of systematic remediation practices and monitoring data, this study systematically evaluates the effectiveness and applicable conditions of three types of treatment technologies: centralized treatment stations, source control combined with end-of-pipe treatment, and water-sealing ecological plugging. On this basis, governance models applicable to karst regions are distilled. The results show that after six years of remediation, the number of pollution points in the Yudong River Basin decreased from 27 to 12. At the outflow section, the total Fe reduction rate reached 88.3%, the total Mn reduction rate reached 62.3%, and the proportion of contaminated river length was reduced by 78.5%. Each of the three technologies has its own applicable conditions. Centralized treatment stations, characterized by mature technology but high operational costs, are suitable for emergency transition periods. Source control combined with end-of-pipe treatment addresses both symptoms and root causes, making it applicable to complex pollution points. Water-sealing ecological plugging, although cost-controllable, carries a risk of secondary pollution in karst-developed areas. The failure of water-sealing ecological plugging technology is mainly attributed to two mechanisms: bypass flow through karst conduits and overflow induced by water level rise. Based on the six-year remediation practice, this study proposes a source control model for karst conduits centered on the core concepts of “filling, isolating, plugging, intercepting, draining, and controlling”. The implementation process consists of four stages: detailed investigation, graded optimization, stepwise implementation, and long-term monitoring. The core innovation lies in the cross-disciplinary application of coal mine water control techniques to environmental remediation, achieving a shift from passive end-of-pipe treatment to active source control. This model can provide theoretical reference and practical guidance for karst mining areas in Southwest China and other regions with similar geological conditions.

WaterVol. 18(13)
Chang'an University (CN), China National Administration of Coal Geology (CN), China Coal Technology and Engineering Group Corp (China) (CN)
National Key Research and Development Program of China
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Mine drainage and remediation techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.