Life cycle and techno-economic assessment of acid washing as a pretreatment in the production of microalgal hydrochar through hydrothermal carbonization

The increasing demand for energy and material inputs in the agroindustrial sector has intensified pressure on natural resources, highlighting the need for sustainable and low-environmental-impact production pathways. In this context, this study assesses the effects of acid pretreatment of microalgal biomass prior to hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) on hydrochar production, considering technical, economic, and environmental aspects. Thus, three scenarios were evaluated: (i) direct HTC (SC1); (ii) HTC with acid pretreatment (SC2); and (iii) HTC with acid pretreatment and acid recovery and recirculation (SC3). Hydrochar production was modeled using Aspen Plus®, economic feasibility was assessed through techno-economic analysis, and environmental impacts were quantified via life cycle assessment using SimaPro®. In SC1, the mass yield was 418.08 kg.h⁻¹ and the minimum selling price (MSP) was USD 2.83 kg⁻¹. In contrast, SC2 increased the higher heating value (HHV) of the hydrochar, but reduced hydrochar production to 264.45 kg.h⁻¹, raised the MSP to USD 9.92 kg⁻¹ (90.9% of operating costs attributed to HCl consumption), and resulted in higher environmental impacts in 17 out of 18 midpoint categories evaluated. SC3 maintained the hydrochar HHV and mass yield observed in SC2 while reducing HCl consumption, resulting in an intermediate performance, with an MSP of USD 7.41 kg⁻¹. The acid recovery and recirculation proved to be an effective approach to reduce costs and environmental impacts, although it was still not sufficient to outperform SC2. Overall, SC1 showed superior economic and environmental performance, whereas SC2 and SC3 improved hydrochar quality at the expense of higher costs and environmental impacts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of environmental chemical engineering
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2026.123714
Primary Topic
Algal biology and biofuel production
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Life cycle and techno-economic assessment of acid washing as a pretreatment in the production of microalgal hydrochar through hydrothermal carbonization

Bianca Barros Marangon, Rejane Nascentes, Maurino Magno de Jesus, Nayara Vilela Avelar et al.
Journal of environmental chemical engineering
Algal biology and biofuel production
article

Life cycle and techno-economic assessment of acid washing as a pretreatment in the production of microalgal hydrochar through hydrothermal carbonization

Bianca Barros Marangon, Rejane Nascentes, Maurino Magno de Jesus, Nayara Vilela Avelar, Maria Lúcia Calijuri, Bruno Silva Henriques, Ana Paula Maciel de Castro, Fábio de Ávila Rodrigues, Mariana Marinho Viana França, Christhians Leonel Mora Rodríguez, Diêgo Rafael Félix Olegário
article en

Abstract

The increasing demand for energy and material inputs in the agroindustrial sector has intensified pressure on natural resources, highlighting the need for sustainable and low-environmental-impact production pathways. In this context, this study assesses the effects of acid pretreatment of microalgal biomass prior to hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) on hydrochar production, considering technical, economic, and environmental aspects. Thus, three scenarios were evaluated: (i) direct HTC (SC1); (ii) HTC with acid pretreatment (SC2); and (iii) HTC with acid pretreatment and acid recovery and recirculation (SC3). Hydrochar production was modeled using Aspen Plus®, economic feasibility was assessed through techno-economic analysis, and environmental impacts were quantified via life cycle assessment using SimaPro®. In SC1, the mass yield was 418.08 kg.h⁻¹ and the minimum selling price (MSP) was USD 2.83 kg⁻¹. In contrast, SC2 increased the higher heating value (HHV) of the hydrochar, but reduced hydrochar production to 264.45 kg.h⁻¹, raised the MSP to USD 9.92 kg⁻¹ (90.9% of operating costs attributed to HCl consumption), and resulted in higher environmental impacts in 17 out of 18 midpoint categories evaluated. SC3 maintained the hydrochar HHV and mass yield observed in SC2 while reducing HCl consumption, resulting in an intermediate performance, with an MSP of USD 7.41 kg⁻¹. The acid recovery and recirculation proved to be an effective approach to reduce costs and environmental impacts, although it was still not sufficient to outperform SC2. Overall, SC1 showed superior economic and environmental performance, whereas SC2 and SC3 improved hydrochar quality at the expense of higher costs and environmental impacts.

Journal of environmental chemical engineeringVol. 14(5)
Universidade Federal de Viçosa (BR)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Algal biology and biofuel production
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.