A Meta‐Analysis of Self–Other Differences in Prejudice

ABSTRACT In this meta‐analysis, we assessed self–other differences in prejudice: the extent to which people think that other people harbour more negative attitudes (or more stereotypical beliefs) about members of certain social groups than they themselves do. We found an average medium‐to‐large effect, d = 0.71, and evidence supporting dual‐process accounts. However, we also found extreme heterogeneity. Some moderators modulate the effect (e.g., the self–other asymmetry is larger for judgements related to race/ethnicity and sexual orientation), but the heterogeneity remained high even when considering these moderators, suggesting that further research is needed to make sense of these self–other asymmetries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Social Psychology
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.70094
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Meta‐Analysis of Self–Other Differences in Prejudice

Sofia Narciso, Cristina Mendonça, André Mata
European Journal of Social Psychology
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

A Meta‐Analysis of Self–Other Differences in Prejudice

Sofia Narciso, Cristina Mendonça, André Mata
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this meta‐analysis, we assessed self–other differences in prejudice: the extent to which people think that other people harbour more negative attitudes (or more stereotypical beliefs) about members of certain social groups than they themselves do. We found an average medium‐to‐large effect, d = 0.71, and evidence supporting dual‐process accounts. However, we also found extreme heterogeneity. Some moderators modulate the effect (e.g., the self–other asymmetry is larger for judgements related to race/ethnicity and sexual orientation), but the heterogeneity remained high even when considering these moderators, suggesting that further research is needed to make sense of these self–other asymmetries.

European Journal of Social Psychology
University of Lisbon (PT), LIP - Laboratory of Instrumentation and Experimental Particle Physics (PT), ISPA - Instituto Universitário (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.