Sex in the Plural: A Scoping Review on Group Sex Cultures and Sexual Health in the Biomedical Era

Abstract Group sex, understood as sexual encounters involving three or more participants, constitutes an important yet understudied dimension of contemporary sexual life. Although frequently examined in relation to HIV, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), or chemsex, group sex is rarely treated as a social and sexual phenomenon in its own right. Moreover, the widespread adoption of biomedical HIV prevention strategies, particularly pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), has transformed how sexual risk, intimacy, and responsibility are negotiated in collective sexual contexts. This scoping review synthesizes peer-reviewed literature published between 2011 and 2025 that examines group sex cultures and sexual health across populations, settings, and methodological approaches. The review maps dominant conceptual frameworks, study designs, and health outcomes, with particular attention to differences between gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) and non-GBMSM populations and to shifts associated with the biomedical era. Findings reveal a fragmented literature dominated by cross-sectional quantitative studies focused on GBMSM populations, while qualitative research offers richer accounts of pleasure, negotiation, and care. Across studies, group sex environments function as socially organized spaces governed by norms, infrastructures, and collective risk-management practices. While biomedical prevention has reduced HIV-related anxiety and expanded sexual possibility, bacterial STIs, stigma, and selective disclosure in healthcare settings persist. The review highlights recurring contradictions between epidemiological framings and participants’ lived experiences and argues for treating sex in the plural as a necessary analytic shift. Future research would benefit from longitudinal, event-level, and ethnographic approaches that better capture the relational and collective dimensions of sexual health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sexuality & Culture
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-026-10599-2
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sex in the Plural: A Scoping Review on Group Sex Cultures and Sexual Health in the Biomedical Era

Sergio Villanueva Baselga
Sexuality & Culture
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
article

Sex in the Plural: A Scoping Review on Group Sex Cultures and Sexual Health in the Biomedical Era

Sergio Villanueva Baselga
article en

Abstract

Abstract Group sex, understood as sexual encounters involving three or more participants, constitutes an important yet understudied dimension of contemporary sexual life. Although frequently examined in relation to HIV, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), or chemsex, group sex is rarely treated as a social and sexual phenomenon in its own right. Moreover, the widespread adoption of biomedical HIV prevention strategies, particularly pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), has transformed how sexual risk, intimacy, and responsibility are negotiated in collective sexual contexts. This scoping review synthesizes peer-reviewed literature published between 2011 and 2025 that examines group sex cultures and sexual health across populations, settings, and methodological approaches. The review maps dominant conceptual frameworks, study designs, and health outcomes, with particular attention to differences between gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) and non-GBMSM populations and to shifts associated with the biomedical era. Findings reveal a fragmented literature dominated by cross-sectional quantitative studies focused on GBMSM populations, while qualitative research offers richer accounts of pleasure, negotiation, and care. Across studies, group sex environments function as socially organized spaces governed by norms, infrastructures, and collective risk-management practices. While biomedical prevention has reduced HIV-related anxiety and expanded sexual possibility, bacterial STIs, stigma, and selective disclosure in healthcare settings persist. The review highlights recurring contradictions between epidemiological framings and participants’ lived experiences and argues for treating sex in the plural as a necessary analytic shift. Future research would benefit from longitudinal, event-level, and ethnographic approaches that better capture the relational and collective dimensions of sexual health.

Sexuality & Culture
Barcelona Media (ES), Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Universitat de Barcelona, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.