Collaborative scenario development as an initiator of transformative thinking in flood risk management

The interplay between climate extremes, urbanisation, and land use planning poses a complex challenge for policymakers, disaster managers and residents of flood-prone areas. Stakeholders must navigate these factors to reduce flood risk while also sustaining livelihoods against increasing extremes and intensifying flood hazards. Transformative adaptation, involving system changes to socio-ecological system, is an effective way to address structural drivers and causes of vulnerability. Existing adaptation measures often produce uneven outcomes and can lead to maladaptation, highlighting the need for a transformative approach. This study explores how combining collaborative exploratory scenario development with backcasting can foster transformative thinking and raise awareness for the risk of maladaptive responses. We applied this approach in Ghana and involved stakeholders from three flood-prone regions (Accra, Kumasi and Bolgatanga) in two workshops. We implemented a three-step process: 1) qualitative system analysis to understand “What is?”, 2) exploratory scenario analysis to explore “What could happen?”, and 3) backcasting adaptation measures to identify “How to get there?”. This process was complemented by focus group discussions and transect walks in flood-prone communities. The findings reveal a shift in stakeholder preferences from reactive interventions to more transformative and systemic strategies. The study illustrates that the approach can initiate transformative thinking in flood risk management by making assumptions, trade-offs, risk of maladaptation and enabling conditions visible before adaptation measures are implemented. It provides a scalable methodology for addressing flood risk in other socio-ecologically diverse and vulnerable regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Policy
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104427
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Collaborative scenario development as an initiator of transformative thinking in flood risk management

Joshua Ntajal, Britta Höllermann, Mariele Evers, Adrian Almoradie
Environmental Science & Policy
Disaster Management and Resilience
article

Collaborative scenario development as an initiator of transformative thinking in flood risk management

Joshua Ntajal, Britta Höllermann, Mariele Evers, Adrian Almoradie
article en

Abstract

The interplay between climate extremes, urbanisation, and land use planning poses a complex challenge for policymakers, disaster managers and residents of flood-prone areas. Stakeholders must navigate these factors to reduce flood risk while also sustaining livelihoods against increasing extremes and intensifying flood hazards. Transformative adaptation, involving system changes to socio-ecological system, is an effective way to address structural drivers and causes of vulnerability. Existing adaptation measures often produce uneven outcomes and can lead to maladaptation, highlighting the need for a transformative approach. This study explores how combining collaborative exploratory scenario development with backcasting can foster transformative thinking and raise awareness for the risk of maladaptive responses. We applied this approach in Ghana and involved stakeholders from three flood-prone regions (Accra, Kumasi and Bolgatanga) in two workshops. We implemented a three-step process: 1) qualitative system analysis to understand “What is?”, 2) exploratory scenario analysis to explore “What could happen?”, and 3) backcasting adaptation measures to identify “How to get there?”. This process was complemented by focus group discussions and transect walks in flood-prone communities. The findings reveal a shift in stakeholder preferences from reactive interventions to more transformative and systemic strategies. The study illustrates that the approach can initiate transformative thinking in flood risk management by making assumptions, trade-offs, risk of maladaptation and enabling conditions visible before adaptation measures are implemented. It provides a scalable methodology for addressing flood risk in other socio-ecologically diverse and vulnerable regions.

Environmental Science & PolicyVol. 181
University of Bonn (DE), Osnabrück University (DE), Emschergenossenschaft (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Disaster Management and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.