Exploring Non-Embodied AI-Based Digital Companions for Older Adults in Aging and Care Contexts: Protocol for a Scoping Review

Background: Conversational artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are increasingly positioned as a response to social isolation, loneliness, and unmet psychosocial needs across health and care contexts. Non-embodied AI-based digital companions have attracted growing attention for their potential to support companionship, social interaction, communication, and psychosocial well-being among older adults, including people living with dementia. However, the evidence base remains underexplored. Terminology is inconsistently applied, systems are variably defined, and studies are distributed across disciplinary silos, limiting critical investigation of how these technologies are conceptualized, designed, and evaluated. Objective: This study aims to map and critically synthesize the existing literature on non-embodied AI-based digital companions for older adults in aging, health, and care contexts. The review seeks to describe digital companions, examine methodological approaches, and identify research gaps. Methods: This protocol follows the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and will be reported in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines). A comprehensive search will be conducted across multiple electronic databases, including MEDLINE, APA PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library, as well as selected gray literature sources. The search strategy combined terms related to digital companions, conversational AI, aging, and care contexts, including concepts related to companionship, social interaction, communication, loneliness, and psychosocial support., Eligible studies will include empirical studies involving older adults that examine non-embodied AI-based digital companions designed primarily to support companionship, social interaction, communication, or related psychosocial support in aging, health, and care contexts. Two reviewers (YC and MG) will independently conduct study selection and data charting. Data will be synthesized using descriptive statistics and narrative analysis. Results: This protocol outlines a systematic approach to identifying, selecting, and synthesizing the existing evidence on non-embodied AI-based digital companions. A preliminary PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses)-style search flow for the revised database searches identified 2289 records from MEDLINE, CINAHL, and APA PsycINFO. After duplicate removal and eligibility-based removals before screening, 1978 records remained available for title and abstract screening. The full scoping review will summarize study characteristics, populations, contexts, digital companion features, and methodological trends using descriptive tables and narrative synthesis. As of June 2026, the revised database searches had been completed for MEDLINE, CINAHL, and APA PsycINFO, and title and abstract screening was underway. The full scoping review results are expected to be submitted for publication after screening, data charting, and synthesis are completed. Conclusions: This scoping review is expected to clarify conceptual boundaries, map the scope of current research, and identify knowledge gaps related to non-embodied AI-based digital companions in health, aging, and care contexts. The findings will inform future research, design, and implementation of non-embodied AI-based digital companions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JMIR Research Protocols
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/93196
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Non-Embodied AI-Based Digital Companions for Older Adults in Aging and Care Contexts: Protocol for a Scoping Review

Lillian Hung, Yi-Ting Chiu, Maral Ghodsi
JMIR Research Protocols
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

Exploring Non-Embodied AI-Based Digital Companions for Older Adults in Aging and Care Contexts: Protocol for a Scoping Review

Lillian Hung, Yi-Ting Chiu, Maral Ghodsi
article en

Abstract

Background: Conversational artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are increasingly positioned as a response to social isolation, loneliness, and unmet psychosocial needs across health and care contexts. Non-embodied AI-based digital companions have attracted growing attention for their potential to support companionship, social interaction, communication, and psychosocial well-being among older adults, including people living with dementia. However, the evidence base remains underexplored. Terminology is inconsistently applied, systems are variably defined, and studies are distributed across disciplinary silos, limiting critical investigation of how these technologies are conceptualized, designed, and evaluated. Objective: This study aims to map and critically synthesize the existing literature on non-embodied AI-based digital companions for older adults in aging, health, and care contexts. The review seeks to describe digital companions, examine methodological approaches, and identify research gaps. Methods: This protocol follows the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and will be reported in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines). A comprehensive search will be conducted across multiple electronic databases, including MEDLINE, APA PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library, as well as selected gray literature sources. The search strategy combined terms related to digital companions, conversational AI, aging, and care contexts, including concepts related to companionship, social interaction, communication, loneliness, and psychosocial support., Eligible studies will include empirical studies involving older adults that examine non-embodied AI-based digital companions designed primarily to support companionship, social interaction, communication, or related psychosocial support in aging, health, and care contexts. Two reviewers (YC and MG) will independently conduct study selection and data charting. Data will be synthesized using descriptive statistics and narrative analysis. Results: This protocol outlines a systematic approach to identifying, selecting, and synthesizing the existing evidence on non-embodied AI-based digital companions. A preliminary PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses)-style search flow for the revised database searches identified 2289 records from MEDLINE, CINAHL, and APA PsycINFO. After duplicate removal and eligibility-based removals before screening, 1978 records remained available for title and abstract screening. The full scoping review will summarize study characteristics, populations, contexts, digital companion features, and methodological trends using descriptive tables and narrative synthesis. As of June 2026, the revised database searches had been completed for MEDLINE, CINAHL, and APA PsycINFO, and title and abstract screening was underway. The full scoping review results are expected to be submitted for publication after screening, data charting, and synthesis are completed. Conclusions: This scoping review is expected to clarify conceptual boundaries, map the scope of current research, and identify knowledge gaps related to non-embodied AI-based digital companions in health, aging, and care contexts. The findings will inform future research, design, and implementation of non-embodied AI-based digital companions.

JMIR Research ProtocolsVol. 15
University of British Columbia (CA), University of Waterloo (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.