Comparative Efficacy of Laser Acupuncture and Direct Photobiomodulation for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Hypoesthesia After Mandibular Third Molar Extraction: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial

Background: Inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) sensory disturbance after mandibular third molar extraction can persist and affect speech, mastication, and quality of life. Photobiomodulation (PBM) has been used to promote peripheral nerve recovery, but the most suitable irradiation strategy remains unclear. Laser acupuncture (LA) delivers PBM to predefined acupoints and may provide both local and central neuromodulatory effects. Objective: To compare standardized LA with direct nerve-trajectory PBM for post-extraction IAN hypoesthesia in a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Methods: Adults aged 18–60 years with unilateral IAN hypoesthesia lasting ≥7 days and ≤12 weeks were randomized (1:1:1) to LA, direct PBM along the external IAN projection, or sham treatment. All participants received mecobalamin (0.5 mg, three times daily) for 30 days. PBM was delivered using an 808-nm diode laser (continuous wave, 100 mW; beam area 1.0 cm 2 ), 90 s/site (9 J; 9 J/cm 2 ), every other day for 15 sessions. LA used a fixed 5 + 2 prescription: ST4, ST6, ST7, CV24, Jiachengjiang (EX-HN19), plus LI4 and PC6. Primary outcomes were two-point discrimination (TPD) and Semmes–Weinstein monofilament examination (SWME) at day 30. Secondary outcomes included Visual Analog Scale (VAS) numbness, additional sensory tests, and day-60 follow-up. Results: Sixty participants completed the intervention. Both active groups improved more than sham for TPD and SWME (group × time p < 0.01). Mean TPD change at day 30 was −3.2 ± 1.8 mm (LA) and −2.6 ± 1.7 mm (direct PBM) versus −0.8 ± 1.1 mm (sham). SWME improved by ≥1 grade in 85%, 80%, and 25%, respectively. VAS numbness decreased by 60%, 48%, and 12%, respectively, and the improvement was largely maintained at day 60. No treatment-related adverse events occurred. Conclusions: Under matched PBM dosimetry, both irradiation strategies improved sensory recovery compared with sham. LA produced comparable results and was associated with greater improvement in patient-reported numbness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Photobiomodulation Photomedicine and Laser Surgery
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/25785478261462397
Primary Topic
Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Efficacy of Laser Acupuncture and Direct Photobiomodulation for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Hypoesthesia After Mandibular Third Molar Extraction: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial

Miaomiao Yang, Yongqing Ma, Jiang Sun
Photobiomodulation Photomedicine and Laser Surgery
Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine
article

Comparative Efficacy of Laser Acupuncture and Direct Photobiomodulation for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Hypoesthesia After Mandibular Third Molar Extraction: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial

Miaomiao Yang, Yongqing Ma, Jiang Sun
article en

Abstract

Background: Inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) sensory disturbance after mandibular third molar extraction can persist and affect speech, mastication, and quality of life. Photobiomodulation (PBM) has been used to promote peripheral nerve recovery, but the most suitable irradiation strategy remains unclear. Laser acupuncture (LA) delivers PBM to predefined acupoints and may provide both local and central neuromodulatory effects. Objective: To compare standardized LA with direct nerve-trajectory PBM for post-extraction IAN hypoesthesia in a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Methods: Adults aged 18–60 years with unilateral IAN hypoesthesia lasting ≥7 days and ≤12 weeks were randomized (1:1:1) to LA, direct PBM along the external IAN projection, or sham treatment. All participants received mecobalamin (0.5 mg, three times daily) for 30 days. PBM was delivered using an 808-nm diode laser (continuous wave, 100 mW; beam area 1.0 cm 2 ), 90 s/site (9 J; 9 J/cm 2 ), every other day for 15 sessions. LA used a fixed 5 + 2 prescription: ST4, ST6, ST7, CV24, Jiachengjiang (EX-HN19), plus LI4 and PC6. Primary outcomes were two-point discrimination (TPD) and Semmes–Weinstein monofilament examination (SWME) at day 30. Secondary outcomes included Visual Analog Scale (VAS) numbness, additional sensory tests, and day-60 follow-up. Results: Sixty participants completed the intervention. Both active groups improved more than sham for TPD and SWME (group × time p < 0.01). Mean TPD change at day 30 was −3.2 ± 1.8 mm (LA) and −2.6 ± 1.7 mm (direct PBM) versus −0.8 ± 1.1 mm (sham). SWME improved by ≥1 grade in 85%, 80%, and 25%, respectively. VAS numbness decreased by 60%, 48%, and 12%, respectively, and the improvement was largely maintained at day 60. No treatment-related adverse events occurred. Conclusions: Under matched PBM dosimetry, both irradiation strategies improved sensory recovery compared with sham. LA produced comparable results and was associated with greater improvement in patient-reported numbness.

Photobiomodulation Photomedicine and Laser Surgery
Jinan Stomatological Hospital (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.