Online vs In-Person Care for Atopic Dermatitis

Importance: Accessible and effective management of atopic dermatitis (AD) across geographic boundaries is important. Scalable, collaborative care models that integrate patients, primary care practitioners, and specialists remain an unmet need. Objective: To determine whether an online, team-based connected health (TCH) model provides equivalent improvements in AD severity compared to in-person care. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this pragmatic, randomized clinical equivalence trial, 300 patients with AD were enrolled from 8 outpatient dermatology clinics in California from August 2019 to May 2024 and randomized 1:1 to online or in-person care. Eligible participants were at least 1 year old and had a physician diagnosis of AD, internet and photograph access, and established or new clinician care. Intervention: The TCH model provided asynchronous, online access to dermatologists. Dermatologists reviewed patients' clinical histories and photographs and provided assessments and treatment recommendations online. The control arm provided conventional, in-person care. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was 12-month change in the EASI (Eczema Area and Severity Index); secondary outcomes were changes in the POEM (Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure) and validated vIGA (Investigator Global Assessment), assessed quarterly. Results: Among 300 adults and children with AD (mean [SD] age, 34.6 [17.7] years; 211 [70.3%] female), 149 were assigned to TCH and 151 to in-person care. The difference in mean change between the 2 groups was -0.01 (95% CI, -0.22 to 0.20) for the EASI, 0.38 (95% CI, 0.03-0.73) for the POEM, and 0.06 (95% CI, 0.00-0.11) for the vIGA. All differences fell within prespecified equivalence margins. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, the online TCH model resulted in equivalent improvements in AD signs and symptoms compared to in-person care. Telehealth models may serve as effective tools for managing chronic diseases like AD. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03981926.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Dermatology
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2026.1959
Primary Topic
Dermatology and Skin Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Online vs In-Person Care for Atopic Dermatitis

Gelfand Ja, Elmar R. Alizadeh, Minnelly Luu, Mary‐Margaret Chren et al.
JAMA Dermatology
Dermatology and Skin Diseases
article

Online vs In-Person Care for Atopic Dermatitis

Gelfand Ja, Elmar R. Alizadeh, Minnelly Luu, Mary‐Margaret Chren, Madison E. Jones, Alyssa Roberts, Jason N. Doctor, Gina Kostandy, Danielle Yee, Jonathan Cotliar, Farzana Choudhury, Myles Cockburn, April W. Armstrong
article en

Abstract

Importance: Accessible and effective management of atopic dermatitis (AD) across geographic boundaries is important. Scalable, collaborative care models that integrate patients, primary care practitioners, and specialists remain an unmet need. Objective: To determine whether an online, team-based connected health (TCH) model provides equivalent improvements in AD severity compared to in-person care. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this pragmatic, randomized clinical equivalence trial, 300 patients with AD were enrolled from 8 outpatient dermatology clinics in California from August 2019 to May 2024 and randomized 1:1 to online or in-person care. Eligible participants were at least 1 year old and had a physician diagnosis of AD, internet and photograph access, and established or new clinician care. Intervention: The TCH model provided asynchronous, online access to dermatologists. Dermatologists reviewed patients' clinical histories and photographs and provided assessments and treatment recommendations online. The control arm provided conventional, in-person care. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was 12-month change in the EASI (Eczema Area and Severity Index); secondary outcomes were changes in the POEM (Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure) and validated vIGA (Investigator Global Assessment), assessed quarterly. Results: Among 300 adults and children with AD (mean [SD] age, 34.6 [17.7] years; 211 [70.3%] female), 149 were assigned to TCH and 151 to in-person care. The difference in mean change between the 2 groups was -0.01 (95% CI, -0.22 to 0.20) for the EASI, 0.38 (95% CI, 0.03-0.73) for the POEM, and 0.06 (95% CI, 0.00-0.11) for the vIGA. All differences fell within prespecified equivalence margins. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, the online TCH model resulted in equivalent improvements in AD signs and symptoms compared to in-person care. Telehealth models may serve as effective tools for managing chronic diseases like AD. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03981926.

JAMA Dermatology
University of Southern California (US), University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US), Children's Hospital of Los Angeles (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Dermatology and Skin Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.