The (In)Effectiveness of Political Advertising in Canada: A Conceptual Replication

Abstract In an effort to conceptually replicate prior work on persuasion and campaign effects, we conducted three randomized survey experiments to evaluate the persuasive effects of political advertisements during the 2025 Canadian federal election. We tested a total of 15 campaign advertisements on 3,346 respondents. Our results are consistent with what seems to be three robust findings about the effects of campaign advertising: (1) they can change candidate evaluations and vote intentions, but (2) the effects are very small, and most importantly, (3) persuasive treatment effects seem to be mostly homogeneous. We offer new empirical evidence that strengthens previous findings on the homogeneity of persuasive treatment effects of political advertising in Canada that challenges the extent to which microtargeting improves candidates and advocacy groups’ ability to sway public opinion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Political Science
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008423926101309
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The (In)Effectiveness of Political Advertising in Canada: A Conceptual Replication

Yannick Dufresne, Catherine Ouellet, Axel Déry
Canadian Journal of Political Science
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

The (In)Effectiveness of Political Advertising in Canada: A Conceptual Replication

Yannick Dufresne, Catherine Ouellet, Axel Déry
article en

Abstract

Abstract In an effort to conceptually replicate prior work on persuasion and campaign effects, we conducted three randomized survey experiments to evaluate the persuasive effects of political advertisements during the 2025 Canadian federal election. We tested a total of 15 campaign advertisements on 3,346 respondents. Our results are consistent with what seems to be three robust findings about the effects of campaign advertising: (1) they can change candidate evaluations and vote intentions, but (2) the effects are very small, and most importantly, (3) persuasive treatment effects seem to be mostly homogeneous. We offer new empirical evidence that strengthens previous findings on the homogeneity of persuasive treatment effects of political advertising in Canada that challenges the extent to which microtargeting improves candidates and advocacy groups’ ability to sway public opinion.

Canadian Journal of Political Science
Western University (CA), Université Laval (CA), Université de Montréal (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.