Environmental Disclosure Versus Environmental Performance: Implications for Corporate Financial Performance and Risk

Environmental considerations shape corporate strategy, risk management, and firm valuation. Yet, empirical evidence on the links between environmental performance, environmental disclosures and corporate financial performance is mixed and often omits risk implications. We develop a holistic framework to examine the endogenous inter-relations among corporate environmental performance (CEP), environmental disclosure (CED), financial performance, and risk. We then analyse the simultaneous links between CEP, CED, and both accounting- and market-based measures of performance and risk for a large panel of US listed firms. The findings reveal that environmental performance and environmental disclosure have fundamentally distinct economic implications. Environmental performance is associated with lower accounting profitability but higher market valuation and lower operating and market risk. These findings suggest that while substantive environmental initiatives may involve short-term costs, they enhance long-term value and organisational resilience. In contrast, environmental disclosure is associated with higher accounting profitability but lower market valuation and higher operating and market risk. This finding suggests that environmental communication may strengthen stakeholder relations while simultaneously increasing investor awareness of environmental exposures and sustainability-related uncertainties. We also find a strong positive association between environmental performance and environmental disclosure, suggesting that environmental reporting increasingly reflects underlying environmental actions rather than symbolic signalling alone. Overall, the results highlight the importance of distinguishing between environmental actions and environmental communication when evaluating corporate environmental strategy, firm value, and risk. Overall, the results carry implications for managers, investors, and regulators seeking to evaluate the role of corporate environmental strategy in corporate resilience, transparency, and value creation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Risks
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/risks14090192
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental Disclosure Versus Environmental Performance: Implications for Corporate Financial Performance and Risk

Grzegorz Trojanowski, Amama Shaukat
Risks
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Environmental Disclosure Versus Environmental Performance: Implications for Corporate Financial Performance and Risk

Grzegorz Trojanowski, Amama Shaukat
article en

Abstract

Environmental considerations shape corporate strategy, risk management, and firm valuation. Yet, empirical evidence on the links between environmental performance, environmental disclosures and corporate financial performance is mixed and often omits risk implications. We develop a holistic framework to examine the endogenous inter-relations among corporate environmental performance (CEP), environmental disclosure (CED), financial performance, and risk. We then analyse the simultaneous links between CEP, CED, and both accounting- and market-based measures of performance and risk for a large panel of US listed firms. The findings reveal that environmental performance and environmental disclosure have fundamentally distinct economic implications. Environmental performance is associated with lower accounting profitability but higher market valuation and lower operating and market risk. These findings suggest that while substantive environmental initiatives may involve short-term costs, they enhance long-term value and organisational resilience. In contrast, environmental disclosure is associated with higher accounting profitability but lower market valuation and higher operating and market risk. This finding suggests that environmental communication may strengthen stakeholder relations while simultaneously increasing investor awareness of environmental exposures and sustainability-related uncertainties. We also find a strong positive association between environmental performance and environmental disclosure, suggesting that environmental reporting increasingly reflects underlying environmental actions rather than symbolic signalling alone. Overall, the results highlight the importance of distinguishing between environmental actions and environmental communication when evaluating corporate environmental strategy, firm value, and risk. Overall, the results carry implications for managers, investors, and regulators seeking to evaluate the role of corporate environmental strategy in corporate resilience, transparency, and value creation.

RisksVol. 14(9)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.