Perceived barriers and facilitators influencing cervical and breast cancer screening among healthcare professionals in the Cape Coast Metropolis, Ghana: An explanatory mixed-methods study

Abstract Background Cervical and breast cancers remain major public health challenges globally and account for substantial morbidity and mortality among women, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Healthcare professionals play a critical role in promoting cancer prevention, early detection, and screening; however, participation in cancer screening among healthcare professionals remains suboptimal in many settings. This study explored barriers and facilitators influencing cervical and breast cancer screening among healthcare professionals in the Cape Coast Metropolis of Ghana using an explanatory mixed-methods approach. Methods An explanatory sequential mixed-methods study was conducted among healthcare professionals working in selected health facilities within the Cape Coast Metropolis. The quantitative component involved 517 healthcare professionals who completed structured questionnaires assessing health-system factors, screening intentions, recommendation behaviors, perceived barriers, and suggested interventions. Qualitative data was obtained through in-depth interviews with healthcare professionals purposively selected from different professional groups. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis framework. Results Most participants reported the availability of onsite cervical (63.0%) and breast (61.9%) cancer screening services; however, only 23.0% indicated that their institutions provided protected work time or formal support for screening attendance. More than half (53.6%) expressed willingness to undergo screening within the next 12 months, while 56.1% regularly recommended screening to patients. The main barriers to screening were lack of time, fear of diagnosis, confidentiality concerns, and financial constraints. Qualitative analysis generated four themes: knowledge and awareness of cancer screening; attitudes, beliefs and perceptions toward screening; structural and workplace barriers; and motivators and strategies for improving screening uptake. Conclusion This mixed-methods study demonstrates that barriers and facilitators to cervical and breast cancer screening among healthcare professionals extend beyond individual knowledge and attitudes to include workplace and health-system influences. Integrated findings highlighted the importance of workload management, confidential screening pathways, affordable screening services, and institutional support in promoting screening participation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-30234-x
Primary Topic
Women's cancer prevention and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Perceived barriers and facilitators influencing cervical and breast cancer screening among healthcare professionals in the Cape Coast Metropolis, Ghana: An explanatory mixed-methods study

Stephen Mensah Arhin, Christopher Alatarige, Patience Ami Kponyoh
4 links
BMC Public Health
Women's cancer prevention and management
article

Perceived barriers and facilitators influencing cervical and breast cancer screening among healthcare professionals in the Cape Coast Metropolis, Ghana: An explanatory mixed-methods study

Stephen Mensah Arhin, Christopher Alatarige, Patience Ami Kponyoh
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Cervical and breast cancers remain major public health challenges globally and account for substantial morbidity and mortality among women, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Healthcare professionals play a critical role in promoting cancer prevention, early detection, and screening; however, participation in cancer screening among healthcare professionals remains suboptimal in many settings. This study explored barriers and facilitators influencing cervical and breast cancer screening among healthcare professionals in the Cape Coast Metropolis of Ghana using an explanatory mixed-methods approach. Methods An explanatory sequential mixed-methods study was conducted among healthcare professionals working in selected health facilities within the Cape Coast Metropolis. The quantitative component involved 517 healthcare professionals who completed structured questionnaires assessing health-system factors, screening intentions, recommendation behaviors, perceived barriers, and suggested interventions. Qualitative data was obtained through in-depth interviews with healthcare professionals purposively selected from different professional groups. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis framework. Results Most participants reported the availability of onsite cervical (63.0%) and breast (61.9%) cancer screening services; however, only 23.0% indicated that their institutions provided protected work time or formal support for screening attendance. More than half (53.6%) expressed willingness to undergo screening within the next 12 months, while 56.1% regularly recommended screening to patients. The main barriers to screening were lack of time, fear of diagnosis, confidentiality concerns, and financial constraints. Qualitative analysis generated four themes: knowledge and awareness of cancer screening; attitudes, beliefs and perceptions toward screening; structural and workplace barriers; and motivators and strategies for improving screening uptake. Conclusion This mixed-methods study demonstrates that barriers and facilitators to cervical and breast cancer screening among healthcare professionals extend beyond individual knowledge and attitudes to include workplace and health-system influences. Integrated findings highlighted the importance of workload management, confidential screening pathways, affordable screening services, and institutional support in promoting screening participation.

BMC Public Health
University of Cape Coast (GH)
Good health and well-being, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Women's cancer prevention and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon