Third molar agenesis: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective Third molars (M3s) are the teeth most frequently affected by agenesis in modern human permanent dentition. Despite extensive research, reported prevalence rates vary considerably across populations and study designs. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to provide an updated global estimate of the prevalence and patterns of M3 agenesis by incorporating evidence published since the previous comprehensive review by Carter and Worthington (2016).Design A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Virtual Health Library, SciElo, and Open Access Theses and Dissertations to identify relevant studies reporting radiographically diagnosed M3 agenesis in individuals aged ≥ 11 years. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate pooled prevalence and to examine differences according to sex and jaw.Results A total of 125 data points comprising 87,282 individuals were included. The pooled global prevalence of M3 agenesis was 23.07% (95% CI: 21.2-25.0%), with substantial heterogeneity across studies (I² =97.6%). No significant difference was observed between prevalence estimates from the earlier dataset and newly included studies (2015-2025). Sex stratified analysis indicated slightly lower odds of agenesis in males compared to females (OR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.71-0.99). Jaw-specific analysis revealed higher odds of agenesis in the maxilla than in the mandible (OR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.12-2.18).Conclusion These outcomes confirm that agenesis of at least one M3 affects approximately one quarter of the global population - a finding that can be relevant and should be considered by professionals in clinical, forensic, and academic contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/98778
Primary Topic
dental development and anomalies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Third molar agenesis: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

N. Pandis, N. Angelakopoulos, N. Gkantidis, R Merdietio Boedi et al.
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
dental development and anomalies
article

Third molar agenesis: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

N. Pandis, N. Angelakopoulos, N. Gkantidis, R Merdietio Boedi, S De Luca, A Franco
article en

Abstract

Objective Third molars (M3s) are the teeth most frequently affected by agenesis in modern human permanent dentition. Despite extensive research, reported prevalence rates vary considerably across populations and study designs. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to provide an updated global estimate of the prevalence and patterns of M3 agenesis by incorporating evidence published since the previous comprehensive review by Carter and Worthington (2016).Design A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Virtual Health Library, SciElo, and Open Access Theses and Dissertations to identify relevant studies reporting radiographically diagnosed M3 agenesis in individuals aged ≥ 11 years. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate pooled prevalence and to examine differences according to sex and jaw.Results A total of 125 data points comprising 87,282 individuals were included. The pooled global prevalence of M3 agenesis was 23.07% (95% CI: 21.2-25.0%), with substantial heterogeneity across studies (I² =97.6%). No significant difference was observed between prevalence estimates from the earlier dataset and newly included studies (2015-2025). Sex stratified analysis indicated slightly lower odds of agenesis in males compared to females (OR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.71-0.99). Jaw-specific analysis revealed higher odds of agenesis in the maxilla than in the mandible (OR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.12-2.18).Conclusion These outcomes confirm that agenesis of at least one M3 affects approximately one quarter of the global population - a finding that can be relevant and should be considered by professionals in clinical, forensic, and academic contexts.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
American Association of Orthodontists (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
dental development and anomalies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.