THE PHILOSOPHICAL AND LINGUISTIC FOUNDATIONS OF SEMIOTICS: THE FORMATION OF A SCIENCE OF SIGNS AND A THEORY OF MEANING

Abstract This study examines the philosophical and linguistic foundations that paved the way for the emergence of semiotics as both a science of signs and a theory of meaning. It is based on the premise that meaning is not a ready-made entity revealed by the sign; rather, it is the product of relations, systems, and interpretation. Accordingly, the history of semiotics can be understood as the history of the transformation of the concept of meaning from reference to difference, from essence to structure, and then from structure to interpretation. This transformation is traced from the etymology of the term and the early insights of ancient and medieval philosophy, through Saussure’s foundational contribution that conceived the sign as a relational value, and Peirce’s project that viewed it as an infinite process, to Roland Barthes’ shift toward a semiotics of signification and Umberto Eco’s openness to interpretation. The study concludes that the problem of reference remains the central obstacle confronting every attempt to close meaning or to provide a complete representation of reality. Keywords: Semiotics, Sign, Signifier and Signified, Immanence, Interpretation, Problem of Reference, Meaning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20786129
Primary Topic
Semiotics and Representation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE PHILOSOPHICAL AND LINGUISTIC FOUNDATIONS OF SEMIOTICS: THE FORMATION OF A SCIENCE OF SIGNS AND A THEORY OF MEANING

Walid Kefali, Radouane Gharbi, Moufida Mizane, Sofiane Zeghid et al.
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Semiotics and Representation Studies
article

THE PHILOSOPHICAL AND LINGUISTIC FOUNDATIONS OF SEMIOTICS: THE FORMATION OF A SCIENCE OF SIGNS AND A THEORY OF MEANING

Walid Kefali, Radouane Gharbi, Moufida Mizane, Sofiane Zeghid, Daoud Neçar
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study examines the philosophical and linguistic foundations that paved the way for the emergence of semiotics as both a science of signs and a theory of meaning. It is based on the premise that meaning is not a ready-made entity revealed by the sign; rather, it is the product of relations, systems, and interpretation. Accordingly, the history of semiotics can be understood as the history of the transformation of the concept of meaning from reference to difference, from essence to structure, and then from structure to interpretation. This transformation is traced from the etymology of the term and the early insights of ancient and medieval philosophy, through Saussure’s foundational contribution that conceived the sign as a relational value, and Peirce’s project that viewed it as an infinite process, to Roland Barthes’ shift toward a semiotics of signification and Umberto Eco’s openness to interpretation. The study concludes that the problem of reference remains the central obstacle confronting every attempt to close meaning or to provide a complete representation of reality. Keywords: Semiotics, Sign, Signifier and Signified, Immanence, Interpretation, Problem of Reference, Meaning.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Batna 1 (DZ), Abbès Laghrour University of Khenchela (DZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Semiotics and Representation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.